2026:JHHC:9186 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 1038 of 2008 Bishu Pandit, son of Panchu Pandit, resident of village – Nawadih, P.O. and P.S. Narayanpur, District – Jamtara … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Rohit Pandit, son of late Teko Pandit 3. Basudeo Pandit, S/o Yaman Pandit, 4. Ram Prasad Pandit, son of Khudu Pandit 5. Lalu Pandit, son of late Teko Pandit 6. Jugeshwar Pandit, son of Khudu Pandit 7. Nand Lal Pandit, son of Bhabho Pandit 8. Laxman Pandit, son of Rohit Pandit 9. Khudu Pandit, late Teko Pandit, Nos.2 to 9 all residents of village – Nawadih, P.O. and P.S. Narayanpur, District – Jamtara … … Opposite parties --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Appellant : Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey, Advocate --- 05/01.04.2026 This criminal revision has been filed challenging the legally, propriety and correctness of the judgment dated 25th September, 2008 passed by 5th Addl. Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Jamtara in Sessions Trial No. 6/06, whereby the learned court found the opposite party Nos. 2 to 9 guilty under Sections 323,325 read with sections 149 and 147 of the Indian Penal Code, still granted the benefit of Section 360 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and they were directed to be released on probation and conduct and sentenced them to release by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/= without sureties to appear and receive the same when called upon during the period of two years from the date of judgement. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this criminal revision. 2026:JHHC:9186 2 3. Accordingly, this revision is dismissed as not pressed. 4. Let this order be communicated to the concerned court through FAX/e-mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Saurav/- Uploaded on: