PARVESH SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS
CRWP/8801/2026 · 2026-07-24
Virinder Aggarwal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33329 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33329 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-8801-2026 1 112 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-8801-2026 Date of Decision: 24.07.2026 PARVESH SINGH AND ANOTHER ......... Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present : None. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL
, J. (Oral)
1. No one has appeared as lawyers have suspended the work today.
2. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of directions to respondents Nos. 1 to 3 to ensure protection of the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No.4 to 8.
3. Petitioners are in live-in-relationship and are being threatened with dire consequences by the private respondents. Resultantly, a representation dated 20.07.2026 (Annexure P-4) has been made to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, District Panipat, Haryana for protection of their lives and liberty but in vain.
4. In view of this, petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, District Panipat, Haryana to provide necessary protection to the petitioners after considering threat perceptions to their life and liberty and to ensure that SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.24 16:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-8801-2026 2 the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents.
5. Pending application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of ( VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 24.07.2026 S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.24 16:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document