Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010441432022 NC: 2026:KHC:40283 WP No. 19300 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 19300 OF 2022 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
GANGARANGAIAH S/O LATE NANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS R/AT HONNENAHALLI VILLAGE HEBBUR HOBLI TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 106 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K.V., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS REVENUE SECRETARY VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMKUR TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 101
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TUMKUR SUB DIVISION TUMKUR - 572 101
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010441432022 NC: 2026:KHC:40283 WP No. 19300 of 2022
4.
THE TAHSILDAR TUMKUR TALUK TUMKUR - 572 214
5.
SRI BYATAIAH @ BYATAPPA S/O LATE RANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT HONNENAHALLI VILLAGE HEBBUR HOBLI TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 106
6.
SRI KEMPAIAH S/O LATE NANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT HONNENAHALLI VILLAGE HEBBUR HOBLI TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 106 …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1 TO R4 SRI. M.B. CHANDRACHOODA, ADVOCATE FOR R5, SRI. RAKESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R6)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE
ORDER OF ANNEXURE-A DATED 17.08.2022 MADE IN REVISION PETITION NO.5/2020 PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, TUMKUR DISTRICT, TUMKUR AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010441432022 NC: 2026:KHC:40283 WP No. 19300 of 2022
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 17.08.2022 passed in Revision Petition No.5/2020 by respondent No.2 (Annexure-A).
2. Heard Sri. Manjunatha.K.V.,
learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri. Spoorthy Hegde N., learned HCGP appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4, Sri. M.B.Chandrachooda,
learned counsel appearing for respondent No.5 and Sri. Rakesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.6.
3. Sri. K.V.Manjunatha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo and same is accepted.
4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for both the parties and on careful consideration of the same, would indicate that the petitioner is claiming right over the property based on registered sale deed dated 29.12.1952 and seeking change of khata after 60 years. In that view of the matter, it is
- 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010441432022 NC: 2026:KHC:40283 WP No. 19300 of 2022
open for the petitioner to establish right over the land in question in a manner known to law.
5. In that view of the matter, I do not find any infirmity in the impugned order dated 17.08.2022 passed in Revision Petition No.5/2020 by respondent No.2 (Annexure-A). Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4