SATISH KUMAR v. STATE THROUGH COMMISSIONER/SECRETARY LOCAL BODIES
WP(C)/3496/2019 · 2026-09-22
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3331 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3331 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 3496/2019
Satish Kumar
…..Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ayush Pangotra, Advocate
Vs
State of J&K & Ors.
.….Respondent
Through:
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (22.09.2026)
01. Mr. Ayush Pangotra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the writ petition on account of the grievance of the petitioner having been redressed on its own. His statement is taken on record.
02. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, along with all connected application/s.
03. Interim direction/s, if any, shall stand vacated.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
22.09.2026
SUNIL
Serial No. 100 Regular List