21.08.2026 Sl. No.19 Ct. 446/tkm C. R. M. (A) 2183 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Baishnabnagar Police Station Case No.1529 of 2025 dated 17.11.2025 under sections 179/180/61(2) of BNS 2023 And In Re: XXX … … Petitioner Mr. Sayan Mukherjee Mr. Amanul Islam Mr. Mehedi Masud Ms. R Bhadra … … for the petitioner Ms. Supriti Sarkar … … for the State 1. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that there is a long- standing civil dispute between the petitioner and the family members of the de facto complainant. Due to personal grudge, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the civil dispute has been given a criminal colour. The charge sheet in this case has already been submitted. He, therefore, prays for pre- arrest bail. 2. Learned Advocate for the State produces the case diary and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail made on behalf of the petitioner on the basis of materials available therein. 3. Heard the learned Advocates for the respective parties and perused the materials on record, including the statements of the witnesses recorded in the course of investigation, the medical report, and the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS. Undisputedly, the charge sheet has been submitted; however, certain incriminating materials are available in the case diary and liberty has been reserved by the concerned 2 I.O. to file a supplementary affidavit. Therefore, considering the nature and gravity of the offence and the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that it would not be proper to extend the benefit under Section 482 of the BNSS in favour of the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)