1 CGHC010277502026 2026:CGHC:36457-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 764 of 2026 Suresh Mittal @ Suresh S/o Late Shri Ramniwas Mittal Aged About 64 Years R/o In Front Of Jagdish Medical Store, Gurudwara Road, Tehsil And District Raigarh C. G. ... Appellant(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department of Urban Administration And Development, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur C. G. 2. Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur C. G. 3. Collector District Raigarh, C. G. 496001. 4. Sub Divisional, Magistrate District Raigarh, C. G. 496001. 5. Municipal Corporation Raigarh, Through Commissioner, Raigarh, Municipal Corporation, Raigarh, District Raigarh, C. G. 496001. 6. Naresh Mittal S/o Late Shri Ramniwas Mittal Aged About 58 Years R/o Dhimrapur Chowk Opposite, Of Shyam Petrol Pump, Raigarh, District Raigarh, C. G. 7. Subhash Mittal S/o Late Shri Ramnarayan Mittal Aged About 64 Years R/o Gurudwara Road Raigarh, Tehsil And District Raigarh, C. G. ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2026.08.17 18:23:03 +0530 2 For Appellant : Ms. Astha Patel, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Prasun Bhaduri, Deputy Advocate General. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 17 .08.2026 1. Heard Ms. Astha Patel, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. Prasun Bhaduri, learned Deputy Advocate General, appearing for the State. 2. The present intra-Court appeal has been preferred by the appellant assailing the order dated 24.06.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in WPC No. 3059 of 2026 (Naresh Mittal & Another v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others), whereby the writ petition preferred by the writ petitioners/respondents No. 6 and 7 herein has been disposed of. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that she may be permitted to withdraw the present appeal. 4. Learned State counsel, on the other hand, submits that the direction issued by the learned Single Judge vide order dated 24.06.2026 passed in WPC No. 3059 of 2026 has already been 3 complied with and, therefore, nothing further survives for consideration in the present appeal. 5. In view of the aforesaid submission and since the direction issued by the learned Single Judge has already been complied with, the present appeal has rendered itself infructuous. 6. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan