Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3330 (RAJ)

MAHAVEER SINGH S/O MANGAL SINGH, v. SHRI SUBIR KUMAR, SECRETARY,

CCP/845/2025 · 2026-04-29

Ravi Chirania

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:18262] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 845/2025 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11882/2022 Mahaveer Singh S/o Mangal Singh, Aged About 66 Years, Resident Of Village Jharana, Tehsil Madhorajpura, District Jaipur- 303006. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Subir Kumar, Secretary, Department Of Ayurved, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Shri Anand Kumar Sharma, Director, Department Of Ayurved, Government Of Rajasthan, Ajmer. 3. Shri Mukesh Jingar, Senior Physician, Government Ayurved A Class, Dispensary, Bhinmal, District Jalore. 4. Shri Tara Prakash Yadav, Registrar, Rajasthan Board Of Homeopathic Medicine, Sector- 12, Near Phed Office, Thadi Market, Mahaveer Marg, Mansarover, Jaipur. 5. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Ayurved And Bhartiya Chikitsa Vibhag, Secretariat, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 29/04/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of the order dated 17.04.2026, petitioner has deposited the required money as directed by the respondents. In consequence, respondents have issued the order dated 27.04.2026 by which [2026:RJ-JP:18262] (2 of 2) [CCP-845/2025] they have issued the necessary orders for compliance of the order and payment of the actual benefits. Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma, learned counsel informs this Court that the compliance will be made within a period of five days from the date of passing of this order. In view of the statements made above, the present Civil Contempt Petition is disposed of. Notices are discharged. The petitioner is granted liberty to file application for revival of this petition, in case compliance is not made in view of above statements as made before this Court. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J RAHUL KUMAR /2