Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18502 CRL.P No. 3440 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3440 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
GOWTHAM J., S/O G.D.JAYARAM, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
2.
SMT. UMA W/O G.D.JAYARAM, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
3.
SMT.NAVITHA J.
D/O G.D.JAYARAM, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
PETITIONERS NO. 1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING AT:
NO.1553, 4TH MAIN ROAD, GANDHINAGAR, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU-560 064. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. G.S.VENKAT SUBBARAO., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY KODIGEHALLI POLICE STATION, KODIGEHALLI, BENGALURU.
Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18502 CRL.P No. 3440 of 2026
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
SMT.NISHITHA N.
D/O NANJUNDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, NO.41, 6TH CROSS, GANESHNAGAR, VIRUPAKSHIPURA POST, BENGALURU-560 097. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. CHANNAPPA ERAPPA , HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET SUBMITTED BY KODIGEHALLI POLICE PURSUANT TO THE COMPLAINT OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT HEREIN AGAINST THE PETITIONERS FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 323, 498(A), 494, 504, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC, SEC.3 AND 4 OF D.P ACT IN C.C.NO.2116/2022 PENDING ON THE FILE OF XII A.C.M.M BENGALURU VIDE ANNEUXRE-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18502 CRL.P No. 3440 of 2026
ORAL ORDER Petitioners are accused Nos.1, 2 and 3 are before the Court calling in question the proceedings before the concerned Court in C.C. No.2116 of 2022.
2. Learned HCGP submits that charges have been framed two years prior to the filing of the present petition and the trial is on.
3. The counsel for the petitioners submits that the complainant is not appearing before the concerned Court, therefore impeding the trial to be concluded.
4. In the light of the issue being the one punishable under Sections 498(A), 494, 504, 506 r/w 34 of IPC, while reserving liberty to the petitioners to urge all the contentions before the concerned Court at the appropriate time, I deem it appropriate to direct the concerned Court to conclude the proceedings within an outer limit of six months from the date of receipt of the copy of the order, if not earlier. Ordered according. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE AP