S. No. 27 Regular HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CrlM No. (1749/2024) in CRM(M) No. 757/2024 Nisar Ahmad Mir …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Mudasir Bin Hassan, Advocate Vs. Mohammad Akbar Dar ...Respondent(s) Through: None CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDER 26.09.2026 1. After hearing for a while, ld. counsel for the petitioner fairly conceded that the order of cognizance does not suffer from any infirmity. However, he claims that the Trial Court is bent upon to initiate coercive steps against him. He submits that he is ready to join the proceedings before the Trial Court, however, a direction be given to the Trial Court that coercive steps shall not follow. 2. Given the aforesaid submission, this petition is disposed of with direction to the petitioner to lay a motion before the Trial Court for cancellation/revocation of warrant as the case may be and the Trial Court shall in accordance with law dispose of said application. 3. Having regard to the fact that the offence involves Section 138 N.I. Act, the Trial Court shall ensure that appearance of the petitioner is regulated in accordance with law so that the complaint is taken to its final logical end. 4. Disposed of. (SANJAY PARIHAR) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 26.09.2026 Akhil Dev