SRI. LAKSHMI MAHILA SAHAKARA BANK NIYAMITA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/3343/2021 · 2026-08-07
Ravi V Hosmani
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33297 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33297 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010172382021 NC: 2026:KHC:41774 CRL.P No. 3343 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3343 OF 2021 BETWEEN:
SRI. LAKSHMI MAHILA SAHAKARA BANK NIYAMITA R/O 53 I C MAIN ROAD VIVEKANANDA NAGAR KATRIGUPPE B S K 3RD STAGE BENGALURU REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER SRI GOVINDAIAHA K T …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAGADEESHA S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY BEGUR POLICE STATION BENGALURU-575 01 (REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDINGS BENGALURU-560001)
2.
SMT N PRABHAVAHI W/O SURYANARAYAN NO.22 MARUTHI NILAYA RAMAIAH LAYOUT IST CROSS 1ST MAIN S G PALYA
Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010172382021 NC: 2026:KHC:41774 CRL.P No. 3343 of 2021
BENGALURU-560029 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.MAHESHA P.HCGP FOR R1 SRI. MAHESH C.M. ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT AND COMPLAINT AND ALL PENDING AND FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO THE REGISTRATION OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 POLICE AGAINST THE PETITIONER (ACCUSED NUMBER.3) IN BEGUR POLICE STATION IN CRIME NUMBER 26/2021 PENDING ON THE FILE OF 41ST ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT AT BENGALURU, FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 467,468,420,R/W SEC 34 OF IPC AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010172382021 NC: 2026:KHC:41774 CRL.P No. 3343 of 2021
ORAL ORDER Counsel for petitioner has filed a memo for dismissal of petition on ground that respondent - police has filed 'B' report. Counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner intends to pursue same before trial court.
2. Memo is taken on record.
3. In view of memo, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
KLY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4