1 CGHC010311232026 2026:CGHC:37738 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 791 of 2026 1 - Amitendra Nath Dubey S/o Shri Vijendra Nath Dubey, Aged About 30 Years R/o Rohinipuram Colony, Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 2 - Arun Swami, S/o Late Rang Nath Swami, Aged About 64 Years R/o Rohinipuram Colony, Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 3 - Priayranjan Pandey, S/o Shri Ram Bachan Pandey, Aged About 46 Years R/o Rohinipuram Colony, Raipur, District Raipur C.G. ... Applicants versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Raipur, C.G. 2 - Commissioner, Raipur Division, Raipur C.G. 3 - Naib Tahsildar, Tahsil Navapara, Division Raipur, C.G. 4 - Smt. Nirmala Bai, D/o Late Shri Vinayak Rao, Aged About 61 Years Rajim P.S. Rajim, District Gariyaband, C.G. 5 - Smt. Usha Kiran, S/o Vinayak Rao, R/o Village Rajim, Tahsil Rajim, District Gariyaband, C.G. 6 - Smt. Kamla Bai, W/o Vinayak Rao, R/o Village Rajim, Tahsil Rajim, District Gariyaband, C.G. 7 - Rajesh Kumar, S/o Vinayak Rao, R/o Village Rajim, Tahsil Rajim, District Gariyaband, C.G. 8 - Smt. Vaishali, D/o Vinayak Rao, R/o Quarter No. 8/79/5, Difference Project Amba Jhari, Nagpur, Maharashtra. 9 - Smt. Shakuntala, D/o Vinayak Rao, R/o Near Chandak Building Public School, Nagpur, Maharashtra. 10 - Pushplata Joshi, D/o Vinayak Rao, R/o Village Dhawalpur, District Gariyaband, C.G. 11 - Smt. Chandrakala, D/o Vinayak Rao, R/o Handipara, Tahsil And District Raipur, C.G. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.08.25 10:24:17 +0530 2 12. Shri Laxmi Narayan Mandir Kuhkuha, through Manager Smt. Kamla Bai, R/o Tahsil Rajim, Gariyaband, C.G.. ... Non-applicants (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Applicants : Mr. Shivendra Kumar, Advocate For State : Mr. S.S. Choubey, Govt. Advocate For Respective non- applicants : Mr. Pravin Kumar Jain, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 24.08.2026 1. This MCC has been preferred by the applicant seeking restoration of WPC No.5481/2022. The said writ petition came to be dismissed for want of prosecution by order dated 06.07.2026 as neither the applicant nor counsel appeared when the matter was called for hearing. The applicant has explained the circumstances which led to the non- appearance on the said date and has prayed for restoration of the writ petition to its original file. 2. Upon due consideration of the grounds urged in the application and being satisfied that sufficient cause has been shown for the applicant’s non-appearance, this Court is of the view that the ends of justice require that the writ petition be restored. 3. Accordingly, the MCC is allowed. Resultantly, WPC No.5481/2022 is restored to its original number subject to deposit of costs of Rs.2,000/- payable to the High Court Bar Association Library Fund. Sd/ Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh