Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33285 (PNJ)

BALAJI TRADERS NEAR KULLAMAL PETROL PUMP MATHURA v. HARYANA POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LTD HPGCL AND ANOTHER

ARB/367/2026 · 2026-07-22

Lapita Banerji

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

ARB-367-2026 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Balaji Traders Haryana Power Generation Corporation Ltd. and others CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. for the petitioner. Mr. Shashank Bhandari, for the LAPITA BANERJI This is an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, ‘the 1996 Act’). 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that a Letter of Acceptance dated March 17, 2022 was issued for ‘Purchase of Furnace between the parties which and Conditions. disputes and differences were to be adjudicated by way of arbitration. disputes and differences arose between the parties, a 2023 under Section 21 of the 1996 Act was issued notice, the respondents suggested certain names of learned However, those names are not acceptable to the petitioner. petition. 3. Issue notice 2026 (O&M) Sr. No. 109 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ARB Date Versus Haryana Power Generation Corporation Ltd. and others HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Dheeraj Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Shashank Bhandari, Advocate, for the respondents. *** LAPITA BANERJI, J. (Oral) This is an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, ‘the 1996 Act’). Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that a Letter of Acceptance dated March 17, 2022 was issued for Furnace Oil’. Pursuant thereto an between the parties which was to be governed by the and Conditions. Clause 3.0 contained an arbitration clause under which the disputes and differences were to be adjudicated by way of arbitration. disputes and differences arose between the parties, a er Section 21 of the 1996 Act was issued notice, the respondents suggested certain names of learned However, those names are not acceptable to the petitioner. Issue notice to the respondents. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ARB-367-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.07.2026 …Petitioner Haryana Power Generation Corporation Ltd. and others …Respondents HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Advocate, This is an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, ‘the 1996 Act’). Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that a Letter of Acceptance dated March 17, 2022 was issued for the Pursuant thereto an agreement was entered into was to be governed by the Buyer-Specific Terms Clause 3.0 contained an arbitration clause under which the disputes and differences were to be adjudicated by way of arbitration. Since disputes and differences arose between the parties, a notice dated May 03, er Section 21 of the 1996 Act was issued. In response to the said notice, the respondents suggested certain names of learned arbitrators. However, those names are not acceptable to the petitioner. Hence, this VANDANA 2026.07.24 13:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document ARB-367-2026 (O&M) 4. Mr. Shashank Bhandari, on behalf of the respondents. 5. In view of the above facts and circumstances, appoints Mr. Sector 15 Chandigarh Arbitrator to adjudicate compliance of the 6. Liberty is granted to the parties to raise all claims, counter claims, defences, pleas etc. before the 7. Needless to mention that all the questions arising between the parties shall remain open for determination in the arbitral proceedings and any observation made hereinabove will not be binding on the learned Arbitrator. 8. A reques Mr. R.N.Singh 9. With the directions aforesaid 10. Pending application(s), if any, are accordingly, disposed of. July 22, 2026 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : 2026 (O&M) Mr. Shashank Bhandari, Advocate, on behalf of the respondents. n view of the above facts and circumstances, R.N.Singhal, District and Sessions Judge (Retd.) Sector 15 Chandigarh-160015, Mobile No. adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties, subject to the statutory requirements. Liberty is granted to the parties to raise all claims, counter claims, defences, pleas etc. before the Learned Arbitrator. Needless to mention that all the questions arising between the parties shall remain open for determination in the arbitral proceedings and any observation made hereinabove will not be binding on the learned A request letter along with a copy of this order be sent to hal, District and Sessions Judge (Retd.). With the directions aforesaid ARB Pending application(s), if any, are accordingly, disposed of. (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Advocate, appears and accepts notice n view of the above facts and circumstances, this Court al, District and Sessions Judge (Retd.) # 1182, Mobile No.9316010629 as the Sole between the parties, subject to Liberty is granted to the parties to raise all claims, counter Learned Arbitrator. Needless to mention that all the questions arising between the parties shall remain open for determination in the arbitral proceedings and any observation made hereinabove will not be binding on the learned t letter along with a copy of this order be sent to al, District and Sessions Judge (Retd.). ARB-367-2026 is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, are accordingly, disposed of. (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2026.07.24 13:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document