Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33284 (PNJ)

SEEMA RANI AND ORS v. SHRI KUMAR RAHUL AND ORS

COCP/2181/2026 · 2026-07-23

Vikas Suri

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 103 COCP-2181-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.07.2026 Seema Rani and others ...Petitioners Versus Shri Kumar Rahul and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. R.K. Arora, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Urvashi and Mr. Jugam Arora, Advocates for the petitioners. Mr. Adesh Pal Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Anil Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3. ***** VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed for initiating proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for alleged wilful disobedience of order dated 22.12.2025 (Annexure P-1), passed by this Court in CWP-38578-2025. 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.3, has filed compliance affidavit dated 22.07.2026 of Ms. Sakshi Sawhney, IAS, Mission Director, State Health Society, National Health Mission, Punjab and appended thereto is speaking order dated 15.05.2026, purported to have been filed in compliance of order dated 22.12.2025 (Annexure P-1). 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners, after perusing the aforesaid affidavit submits that since substantial compliance has been SUMIT KUMAR 2026.07.24 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment COCP-2181-2026 (O&M) -2- made, he thus prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to challenge the speaking order dated 15.05.2026, in accordance with law. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. 5. Rule stands discharged. (VIKAS SURI) July 23, 2026 JUDGE sumit.k Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether Reportable : Yes / No SUMIT KUMAR 2026.07.24 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment