1 CGHC010014622017 2026:CGHC:37931 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 6316 of 2017 D. K. Sisodiya S/o Late Shri Thakur Budheshwar Singh, Aged About 62 Years R/o Gurunanak Residency, Shayansh Villa, Gauravpath Champa, Tehsil And Post Office Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Chief Secretary, Govenment Of Chhattisgarh. Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Superintendent Engineer, Public Works Department, Bilaspur Division, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Champa Division, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 4 - Amit Kashyap Posted As Sub Divisinal Officer At Public Works Department, Champa Division, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 5 - Secretary Public Works Department, Raipur Mantralaya New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 6 - Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 7 - The Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 8 - Collector, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. V.R. Tiwari, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Atul Kumar Kesharwani, Advocate 2 For State-Respondent : Mr. Anil S. Pandey, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 24/08/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following prayer(s) :- "10.1 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ of mandamus and to give direction to the respondent authority to take appropriate action against the respondent No.4 on the basis of enquiry report. 10.2 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the charge sheet (Annexure P/6) filed against the petitioner, in the interest of justice. 10.3 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authority that the representation of the petitioner dated 23.08.2017 (Annexure P/7) shall be considered within a specified time period. 10.4 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to provide any other relief(s) as the Hon’ble Court may deem fit under the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner may be permitted to make a detailed representation raising his grievances before the concerned authority, and the authority may be directed to consider and decide such representation within a stipulated period. 3 3. Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, at this juncture, this petition is disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to make a representation before the concerned authority and in turn, the authority concerned is directed to consider and decide the representation, if any, made by the petitioner within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of such representation in accordance with law. 4. With the direction(s), the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Vasant