1 CGHC010254212018 2026:CGHC:37869 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5246 of 2018 Balram Dheemar S/o Derha Ram Dheemar Aged About 37 Years R/o Village Pidhapal Ward No. 10 Pidhapal Post Pidhapal, Tehsil And District Kanker Uttar Bastar Tahsil And District Kanker Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Capital Complex New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Mission Director, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission Board Office, Composite Building 2nd Floor, Pension Bada Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Collector, Kanker And Mission Director District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh., District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Education Officer Kanker, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh., District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pankaj Singh, Advocate For State : Mr. Vivek Siddharth Ojha, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 24/08/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition seeking direction to the respondents to pay them pay scale of Rs.4750-7440/-, Grade Pay Rs.1300/- per month at par with similarly placed employees of the department. The petitioner is a daily wage employee posted with the respondent No.2. 2 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the instant writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondents No.1 & 2 to decide the pending representation of the petitioner within stipulated time. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents would oppose the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents No.1 & 2 to decide the pending representation of the petitioner within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order strictly in accordance with law. 5. With the aforesaid observation(s) and direction(s), this writ petition is hereby disposed of. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on merits of the case. Sd/- Rakesh Mohan Pandey JUDGE Nadim