Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010512812022 NC: 2026:KHC:42496 WP No. 22077 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 22077 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
M/S. CANARA BANK, LARGE CORPORATE BRANCH, RAMANASHREE ARCADE, 3RD FLOOR, 18, M.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. REPRESENTED BY MR.JOSE ANTONY, CHIEF MANAGER. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. CHITHRA NIRMALA P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. IDBI BANK LIMITED SPECIALISED CORPORATE BRANCH, IDBI HOUSE, 58, 2ND FLOOR, MISSION ROAD, BENGALURU-560 002. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY/ BRANCH MANAGER. 2. M/S. RAJESH EXPORTS LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, MR. RAJESH J MEHTA NO.4, BATAVIA CHAMBERS, KUMARAKRUPA ROAD, KUMARA PARK EAST, BENGALURU-560020. A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT BENGALURU. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010512812022 NC: 2026:KHC:42496 WP No. 22077 of 2022
3. MR. RAJESH J MEHTA, S/O. JASWANTH RAI MEHTA, 578, 5TH MAIN, UPPER PALACE ORCHARDS, SADASHIVANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 038. 4. MR. PRASHANT MEHTA, S/O. JASWANTH RAI MEHTA, 555, CHANDAN, 9TH A MAIN ROAD, 1ST STAGE, INDRANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 038. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P.K.SHRIKARA, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. RAGHU HULIKAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER Smt.P.Chithra Nirmala, counsel for the petitioner, Sri.P.K.Shrikara, counsel for respondent No.1 and Sri.Raghu Hulikal, counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4 appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petition may be disposed of as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010512812022 NC: 2026:KHC:42496 WP No. 22077 of 2022
conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition and if an order is passed the petitioner shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. Counsel, therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the writ petition may be disposed of as withdrawn. The oral submission and the memo is placed on record. As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the withdrawal of the petition, the Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
Because of disposal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE
SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26