IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (120) MUBARIK STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. impugned Superintendent of Police, Firozpur Jhirka, on the ground that the same is arbitrary, perverse, and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. 2. seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy by invoking the provisions of Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. on the merits of the case. The liberty granted is solely on the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner and shall not be construed as a direction by July 23, 2026 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICEALOK **** Dr. Mohammad Arshad, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Swati Batra, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed praying for setting aside the impugned enquiry report dated 29.05.2023, passed by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Firozpur Jhirka, on the ground that the same is arbitrary, perverse, and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the peti seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy by invoking the provisions of Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as with the aforesaid liberty. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. The liberty granted is solely on the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner and shall not be construed as a direction by this Court. July 23, 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-70959-2025 Date of Decision:- 23.07.2026 ……Petitioner ……Respondents ALOK JAIN ohammad Arshad, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Swati Batra, Sr. DAG, Haryana. The present petition has been filed praying for setting aside the 29.05.2023, passed by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Firozpur Jhirka, on the ground that the same is arbitrary, perverse, and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy by invoking the provisions of Articles 226 and 227 of In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. The liberty granted is solely on the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner and shall not be construed as a (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 23.07.2026 ……Petitioner ……Respondents The present petition has been filed praying for setting aside the 29.05.2023, passed by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Firozpur Jhirka, on the ground that the same is arbitrary, perverse, and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution tioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy by invoking the provisions of Articles 226 and 227 of In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. The liberty granted is solely on the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner and shall not be construed as a MANJU 2026.07.24 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document