Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
129 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-2319-2026 Date of decision: 23.07.2026
JASMER SINGH ...PETITIONER
V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA
Present: Mr. Harkirat Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)
1.
On 29.01.2026, a request for adjournment was made by learned counsel for the petitioner. On 10.02.2026, again a request for adjournment was made.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner today has again made a request for an adjournment on the ground that he wants to place on record some documents without filing an adjournment slip.
4.
In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same after annexing the said orders in case the petitioner wishes to pursue the present writ petition.
(VIKAS BAHL)
JUDGE
(SUBHAS MEHLA) July 23, 2026
JUDGE Manisha
(i) Whether speaking/reasoned
Yes/No
(ii) Whether reportable
Yes/No
MANISHA 2026.07.24 12:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document