Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33262 (PNJ)

JASMER SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/2319/2026 · 2026-07-23

Subhas Mehla, Vikas Bahl

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

129 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-2319-2026 Date of decision: 23.07.2026 JASMER SINGH ...PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Harkirat Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. On 29.01.2026, a request for adjournment was made by learned counsel for the petitioner. On 10.02.2026, again a request for adjournment was made. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner today has again made a request for an adjournment on the ground that he wants to place on record some documents without filing an adjournment slip. 4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same after annexing the said orders in case the petitioner wishes to pursue the present writ petition. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) July 23, 2026 JUDGE Manisha (i) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable Yes/No MANISHA 2026.07.24 12:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document