IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6508 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2024 Thana- SAHARGHAT District- Madhubani ====================================================== Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Kumar Mukhiya S/o Late Rajdev Mukhiya Resident of village- Rajghatta, P.S- Benipatti, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Murli Dhar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Saharghat P.S. Case No. 50 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 27.05.2024 at about 3:00 P.M., three unknown persons on a Pulsar motorcycle looted Rs. 40,000/- cash and an Android mobile from the driver of the informant after delivery of stone chips and forcibly took away the six-wheeler tipper towards village Pihwara. It is further alleged that the remaining two accused fled on the Pulsar motorcycle, took away the key and mobile of another hyva vehicle, and abandoned the said hyva Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6508 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/3 vehicle by the roadside. 4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 27.05.2024. Petitioner bears two criminal antecedents, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application. 5. It has been further submitted by the petitioner’s counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of self- confessional statement. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner was not even put on T.I. Parade to ascertain his complicity in the alleged occurrence. Charge sheet has already been submitted in this case. 6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 8. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6508 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 3/3 below/concerned Court in connection with Saharghat P.S. Case No. 50 of 2024, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner. (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. Raj Kishore/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T