- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010022932024 NC: 2026:KHC:40640 WP No. 2024 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 2024 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI SURESH B H S/O LATE HUCHAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 2. SMT. VANITHA N. W/O SRI. SURESH B.H. AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT SRIHARI NILAYA, TEACHERS COLONY, ARASINAKUNTE POST, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH - 562 123 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. THIMMANNA, ADVOCATE AND SRI. VENKATESHAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA DISTRICT RAMANAGARA - 562 159 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA SUB DIVISION RAMANAGARA - 562 159 Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010022932024 NC: 2026:KHC:40640 WP No. 2024 of 2024 3. THE TAHSILDAR MAGADI TALUK MAGADI, RAMANAGARA - 562 120 5. SRI. NARAYANAPPA B.H. S/O LATE HUCHAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO.176, MAKALLI VILLAGE, MAKALLI POST, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK - 562 162 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3 SRI. L.M. SOWRABA JEEVALA, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 10/10/2023 PASSED IN REVISION PETITION NUMBER 18/2020-21 BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, (VIDE ANNEXURE-A). FURTHER, THE ORDER PASSED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER IN RA NO. 316/2017-18 DATED 21/12/2019, ACTED IN EXCESS OF JURISDICTION AND POWER SITTING UNDER APPELLATE JURISDICTION UNDER SECTION 136(2) OF KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT 1964 AND PASSED THE ORDER, CONTRARY TO THE PROVISION OF SECTION 136(2) OF KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964. (VIDE ANNEXURE-B). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010022932024 NC: 2026:KHC:40640 WP No. 2024 of 2024 ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioners are assailing the order dated 10.10.2023 (Annexure-A) passed by respondent No.1 and the order dated 21.12.2019 (Annexure-B) passed by respondent No.2. 2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and taking into account the fact that petitioner No.1 and respondent No.4 are the children of late Huchappa and the suit in O.S.No.201/2017 is pending consideration before the competent civil court and as the rights of the parties are yet to be crystallized in the aforementioned suit, I am of the view that there is no error committed by the respondent authorities in the impugned orders. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. 4. It is open for the petitioners to approach the revenue authorities after the conclusion of the civil suit referred above. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE HDK