Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33248 (PNJ)

ROHIT CHHABRA v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/28886/2026 · 2026-07-23

Jasjit Singh Bedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

210 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28886-2026 Date of decision :23.07.2026 ROHIT CHHABRA ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Manik Makkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Adeshwar Pannu, Asstt. A.G., Punjab. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (ORAL) The petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 in case bearing FIR No.0021 dated 18.01.2025 registered under Sections 406, 420, 120 IPC (corresponding Sections 316, 318(4), 61 of BNS, 2023) at Police Station Tripri, District Patiala. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 21.05.2026, the petitioner has joined the investigation to the entire satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. The learned State counsel on instructions admits the aforesaid fact and submits that the petitioner is no more required for further investigation in the case. In view of aforesaid factual position, the interim order dated 21.05.2026 is made absolute. However, the petitioner shall keep on JITESH LAL 2026.07.24 15:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-28886-2026 -2- joining the investigation as and when required to do so and he shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS. Petition stands disposed of. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 23.07.2026 JITESH Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No JITESH LAL 2026.07.24 15:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document