BABAR ALI SEKH @ BABAR SK AND ANR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM (A)/1729/2026 · 2026-08-13
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33248 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33248 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
13.08.2026 Serial no. 544 [G.S.D]
CRM (A) 1729 of 2026
In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Labpur PS Cse No. 144 of 2024 dated 22.08.2024 u/s 126(2)/118(2)/109(1)/61(2)(a) of the BNS.
-And-
In the matter of : Babar Ali Sekh @ Babar Sk. &Anr.
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Dttatreya Dutta Mr. Rabiul Islam Mr. Monjit Bhattacharjee
… for the petitioner(s)
Mr. P. Karan Singh
… for the State-respondent(s)
Learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and were not available at the location. Inspite of that, they have been victimized and implicated in the present case. The records of the case reflect that charge-sheet was submitted in October, 2024 and harsher process of law was subsequently issued. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and draws the attention of the court to the injury report. Having considered the injury sustained by the injured and the fact that the petitioners are the FIR named persons,
2 I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the present petitioners. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (A) 1729 of 2026 is dismissed. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)