Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33247 (KAR)

SUMEET BHANOT v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/871/2021 · 2026-08-07

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010217132020 NC: 2026:KHC:41773 CRL.P No. 871 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 871 OF 2021 BETWEEN: SUMEET BHANOT S/O DHARAM PRAKASH BHANOT AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.203 VINAYAKA RESIDENCY, 4TH CROSS, BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR C V RAMAN NAGAR BANGALORE - 560 093. …PETITIONER (BY SRI MANGANNAVAR GIRISH BABURAO., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. 2. STATE OF KARNATAKA H A L POLICE STATION, BANGALORE REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HONBLE HIGH COURT BANGALORE-560001 MR. RAJENDRA KUMAR ANEJA S/O SH. SANT LAL ANEJA AGED 60 YEARS Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010217132020 NC: 2026:KHC:41773 CRL.P No. 871 of 2021 M/S LAJ EXPORTS LIMITED NO.127, 5TH A MAIN INDUSTRIAL SUBRUB YESHWANTHPUR BENGALURU - 560 022. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MAHESHA, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO a) QUASH THE FIR BEARING NO.529/2019 DATED 04.12.2019 ALONG WITH THE INFORMATION DATED 25.12.2019 REGISTERED WITH THE RESPONDENT HAL POLICE STATION (ANNEXED VIDE ANNEXURE - A AND B AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader submits that on ground of non-appearance, Criminal Petition No.830/2021 arises insofar as another accused, filed by - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010217132020 NC: 2026:KHC:41773 CRL.P No. 871 of 2021 same counsel dismissed for non-prosecution on 06.07.2026. 2. Perusal of order passed in Crl.P.No.830/2021 and order sheet in this case, would indicate that petitioner is not pursuing petition diligently. Hence, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE KLY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3