1 CGHC010050782026 2026:CGHC:37874 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 598 of 2026 1 - Au Small Finance Bank Ltd Registered Office 19 A, Dhuleshwar Garden, Ajmer Road, Jaipur 302001, Rajasthan, Through Authorized Signatory Sumit Maheshwari, Presently Working As Senior Manager, S/o Suresh Chandra Maheshwari, Aged About 42 Years, R/o 30 Chanchal Vihar Colony, Ring Road No. 01, Near Kashiram Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Chief Secretary Mantralaya, New Raipur Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Tehsildar Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - M/s Amit Transcontinental Through Proprietor Amit Kumar Agrawal, S/o Shri Prem Chand Agrawal, R/o 303, Diamond A, Ashoka Ratan Vip Estate, Shankar Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh 5 - Snt Mono Agrawal W/o Shri Amit Kumar Agrawal R/o 303, Diamond A, Ashoka Ratan Vip Estate, Shankar Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioners :- Mr. Sunil Kumar Soni, Advocate For State :- Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, P.L. For Respondent No. 4 :- Mr. Shikhar Shrivastava, Advocate through V.C. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 24.08.2026 1. Following reliefs have been prayed in this petition:- “10.1. This Hon'ble Court may Graciously be pleased to Issue Appropriate Writ Commanding Respondent Authorities for Handing Over the Possession of the Secured Asset in Favor of the Present Petitioner as Adjudicated by the CJM Raipur Order Dated 17.11.2025 Passed in M.J.C No.1631/2025 AU Small Finance Bank V/s M/s Amit Transcontinental and 1 Anr. Immediately and Scrupulously. 10.2. Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and Proper for the Just Adjudication of the case and protecting Constitutional Rights of the Petitioner. 10.3 Cost of the petition.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in view of the pendency of the securitisation application preferred by the petitioner before the competent Debts Recovery Tribunal, the present writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take all necessary and appropriate steps against the 3 borrower, in accordance with law, after disposal of the said securitisation application. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not oppose the aforesaid submission. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take such appropriate steps against the borrower as may be available to it in law, after the securitisation application pending before the competent Debts Recovery Tribunal is decided. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claim of either party. All contentions are left open to be urged before the appropriate forum, in accordance with law. sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha