- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010403762023 NC: 2026:KHC:39826 WP No. 17519 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.17519 OF 2023 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF WAKF DARUL AWAKF, NO. 6 CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU-560051 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHEIF EXECUTIVE OFFICER …PETITIONER (BY KUM. SAMPREETHA .S, ADVOCATE FOR SRI/SMT. SABAHATH SULTANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN BANGALORE - 560 030. 2. ASST. COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH SUBDIVISION BANGALORE - 560 009. 3. TAHSILDAR BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE - 560 010. 4. HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE SIDDAMMA VAJARAHALLI VILLAGE NELAMANGALA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 123. Digitally signed by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010403762023 NC: 2026:KHC:39826 WP No. 17519 of 2023 5. JUMMA MASJID (SUNNI) REP BY ITS PRESIDENT/SECRETARY NELAMANGALA, TOWN AND TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 132. ESTABLISHED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE WAKF ACT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. MANJUNATH .C.V, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. SUBAIR AHMED, ADVOCATE FOR R5; SRI. M. SHIVAPRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR R6 AND R7) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH OR SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 IN R.P.NO.109/22-23 DATED 4.3.2023 AT ANNX-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 04.03.2023 (Annexure-A) passed by respondent No.1 in R.P.No.109/2022-23. 2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful consideration of the material on record, the same would indicate that, the khatha in favour of respondent No.4 was effected based on the order - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010403762023 NC: 2026:KHC:39826 WP No. 17519 of 2023 dated 23.06.1982 passed by the Land Tribunal, Nelamangala. 3. In that view of the matter, as respondent No.4 derives right and title in respect of the land in question based on the order dated 23.06.1982 passed by the Land Tribunal, Nelamangala, I am of the view that, no interference is called for in this petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. In view of dismissal of the writ petition, all pending applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and are accordingly rejected. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3