Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
19.08.2026 Serial no. 824 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (NDPS) 1648 of 2026
In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with N 258 of 2025 arising out of Hasnabad PS Case No. 468 of 2025 dated 25.08.2025 u/s 20(b)(ii)(c)/25/29 read with Section 8(c) of the NDPS Act.
-And-
In the matter of : Rabiul Molla @ Bablu
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. A. Chakraborty
… for the Petitioner(s)
Ms. Arushi Rathore Ms. Moumita Pandit
… for the State-respondent(s)
The petitioner is the driver of the vehicle who has been foisted with the criminal case. There was recovery which have been effected from hide out of the another accused. State has opposed the prayer for bail and submits that substantial recovery was made from the vehicle itself. Learned advocate added that the petitioner along with two other were present in the vehicle. It has been emphasized that the petitioner had conscious information regarding the materials which were being carried out.
2 Having considered the quantum of seizure in the present case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. The trial of the case is progressing smoothly. The learned trial court would keep up with the pace of the trial. Accordingly, CRM (NDPS) 1648 of 2026 is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)