Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33226 (PNJ)

SANJEEV KUMAR JAIN v. SHRI ATMA NAND JAIN SABHA PATI AND OTHERS

CR/2227/2026 · 2026-07-22

Vikas Suri

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 154 CR-2227-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.07.2026 Sanjeev Kumar Jain ...Petitioner Versus Shri Atma Nand Jain Sabha Patti and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral) 1. After arguing for some time, while taking the Court through the impugned order dated 19.05.2025 (Annexure P-4), learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated 07.01.2017 (Annexure P-1), vide which the registers and account books of Sabha were to be produced, also contains an observation regarding the consequences in case of failure of such defendants in producing the said record, which reads as under: “Therefore, I find force in the application in hand and same stands allowed and defendants are directed to produce registers and the accounts books of the Sabha as alleged in the written statement on 24.1.2017 failing which adverse inference shall be drawn against the defendants and defendants will be debarred from producing the said documents lateron.” 2. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does SUMIT KUMAR 2026.07.24 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment COCP-2227-2026 (O&M) -2- not press the present petition. 3. Dismissed as not pressed. (VIKAS SURI) July 22, 2026 JUDGE sumit.k Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether Reportable : Yes / No SUMIT KUMAR 2026.07.24 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment