Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3322 (KAR)

SRI.BASAVARAJU v. SRI.BASAVARAJU

RP/183/2026 · 2026-04-10

R Nataraj

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20027 RP No. 183 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ REVIEW PETITION NO. 183 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SRI. BASAVARAJU AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS S/O. LATE BASAVEGOWDA R/AT. ANNUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, H.D. KOTE TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.S. NAGARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. BASAVARAJU AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS S/O. LATE BASAVEGOWDA R/AT. ANNUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, H.D. KOTE TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT 2. SMT. R. SUSHEELA W/O. LATE B. MARISIDDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, 3. SRI. M. VINAY S/O. LATE B MARISIDDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 4. SMT. VIDYA S/O. LATE B. MARISIDDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT ANNUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, H.D. KOTE TALUK, Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20027 RP No. 183 of 2026 MYSURU DISTRICT -571114 …RESPONDENTS THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS REVIEW PETITION IT IS NECESSARY TO CLARIFY THAT THE FINAL ORDER DATED 01.09.2022 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP NO.22889/2021 (GM-RES) IS NOT MADE APPLICABLE TO THIS PETITIONER WHO IS THE RESPONDENT NO.2, WP NO.22889/2021 (GM-RES) AND, FURTHER IT IS NECESSARY TO CLARIFY PARA 8 OF THE JUDGMENT INSTEAD OF THE WORD DEFENDANTS IT IS TO BE STATED AS DEFENDANT NO.2 TO 4. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would file appropriate application for correction of the order dated 01.09.2022 passed in W.P.No.22889/2021 and he would not pursue this petition. 2. His submission is noted. In view of his submission, this review petition is dismissed. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate application for correction of the order dated 01.09.2022 passed in W.P.No.22889/2021. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20027 RP No. 183 of 2026 3. Pending interlocutory applications if any, do not survive for consideration and the same stand disposed off. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8