Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33210 (CHH)

SAVITA RATHAUR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/6229/2026 · 2026-08-19

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010323092026 2026:CGHC:37289 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6229 of 2026 Savita Rathaur D/o Banau Ram Aged About 39 Years Working As Lecturer L.B. (Maths) Government High School Goplinchuwa District- Mohla-Manpur- Ambagarh-Chowki (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan Nava, Raipur Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Public Instruction Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Bhawan Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - District Education O2cer District- Mohla-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki (C.G.) 4 - Principal Government High School Goplinchuwa, District- Mohla- Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki (C.G.) SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2026.08.20 17:14:30 +0530 2 5 - Principal Government High School Chargaon Block- Koyalibeda, District- North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Vikas Dubey, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Diksha Gouraha, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 20.08.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been transferred from Government High School, Goplinchuwa, District Mohla-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki, to Government High School, Chargaon, Block Koyalibeda, District North Bastar Kanker. He submits that the impugned transfer order has been issued despite the fact that no reliever has been posted at the present place of posting of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is su6ering from a neurological disorder and has a two-year-old child to look after. It is also submitted that the petitioner's mother, who is residing with her, is su6ering from health issues and is undergoing treatment at Bhilai, requiring regular medical check-ups. Learned counsel further submits that the 3 petitioner has approached the Committee constituted under Clause 8 of the Transfer Policy, 2025, by submitting a representation, which is placed on record as Annexure P/6. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the petitioner has already approached the Committee by way of the representation at Annexure P/6, and the same shall be considered in accordance with law within a stipulated period. 3. Considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and having regard to the health condition of the petitioner as well as her mother, and the fact that the petitioner has a two-year-old child, the respondents are directed to consider and decide the petitioner's representation (Annexure P/6) within a period of 25 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such consideration and decision, the e6ect and operation of the transfer order dated 06.08.2026 (Annexure P/1), insofar as it relates to the petitioner, shall remain stayed. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE Shoaib