Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3320 (UTT)

UNION BANK OF INDIA v. ABHISHEK JAIN

SA/6/2026 · 2026-04-10

Siddhartha Sah

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 10.04.2026 SA No.6 of 2026 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Mr. Vikas Kumar Guglani, learned counsel for the appellant through V.C. 2. Dr. Ajar Rab, learned counsel for the respondents through V.C. 3. The Registry has pointed out defects, observing that an appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(u) of the CPC ought to have been filed instead of the present second appeal. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant does not dispute the objections raised by the Registry. 5. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the second appeal with liberty to file an appropriate appeal. 6. The second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with such liberty. (Siddhartha Sah, J.) 10.04.2026 BS