Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
113 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-6165-2026 Date of decision: 23.07.2026 RAMESH AND OTHERS
...PETITIONERS
V/S
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA
Present: Mr. Rajesh K. Sheoran, Advocate and
Mr. Hardeep Singh Poonia, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 to 5. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)
1.
This civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.1 to decide the representation dated 07.09.2020 (Annexure P- 2), whereby respondent authority is requested to release the land of the petitioners.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that there are inadvertent errors in the present writ petition and thus, he seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file fresh petition after giving full and better particulars.
3.
In view of the above, present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(VIKAS BAHL)
JUDGE
(SUBHAS MEHLA) July 23, 2026
JUDGE Manisha
Whether reportable :
Yes/No
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
MANISHA 2026.07.24 12:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document