Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33188 (PNJ)

BHUPINDER SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/40111/2026 · 2026-07-23

Alok Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (121) BHUPINDER SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. direction to the official respondents to decide the representation dated 22.05.2026 (Annexure P petitioner at the instance of the private respondents. 2. withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition, as the present petition contains materia 3. withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action, subject to all just exceptions. 4. on the merits of the case. The liberty granted is solely on the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner and shall not be construed as a direction by this Court. July 23, 2026 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH BHUPINDER SINGH Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICEALOK JAIN **** Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate (through VC) and Mr. G.P.S. Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. ****** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed, direction to the official respondents to decide the representation dated 22.05.2026 (Annexure P-3) and to refrain from unnecessarily harassing the petitioner at the instance of the private respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition, as the present petition contains material discrepancies and typographical errors. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action, subject to all just exceptions. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. The liberty granted is solely on the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner and shall not be construed as a direction by this Court. July 23, 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-40111-2026 Date of Decision:- 23.07.2026 ……Petitioner ……Respondents ALOK JAIN Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate (through VC) and Mr. G.P.S. Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. The present petition has been filed, inter alia, praying for a direction to the official respondents to decide the representation dated 3) and to refrain from unnecessarily harassing the petitioner at the instance of the private respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition, as the l discrepancies and typographical errors. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action, subject to all just exceptions. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. The liberty granted is solely on the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner and shall not be construed as a (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 23.07.2026 ……Petitioner ……Respondents , praying for a direction to the official respondents to decide the representation dated rom unnecessarily harassing the Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition, as the In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid to file a fresh petition on the same It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. The liberty granted is solely on the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner and shall not be construed as a MANJU 2026.07.24 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document