ROSHAN LAL AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/8742/2026 · 2026-07-23
Virinder Aggarwal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33184 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33184 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 CRWP-8742-2026 (O&M) IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 118 CRWP-8742-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.07.2026 ROSHAN LAL AND OTHERS ... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Tamanna Banwala, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Karan Veer Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)
1. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS seeking issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to ensure protection to the petitioners and their family members from any illegal harassment, at the hands of respondents No.4 to 6.
2. After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioners submitted a representation/complaint dated 07.07.2026 (Annexure P- 5) to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Karnal and he would be satisfied if appropriate direction be issued to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Karnal, to consider and decide representation dated 07.07.2026 (Annexure P-5) moved by petitioner and take necessary action thereupon in a time bound manner in accordance with law.
3. Notice of motion to official respondents only.
SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.23 19:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 CRWP-8742-2026 (O&M)
4. Mr. Karan Veer Singh, learned Sr. DAG, Haryana who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits the needful would be done in due course.
5. Keeping in view the limited prayer made by petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Karnal, to decide the representation dated 07.07.2026 (Annexure P-5) submitted by petitioner within a period of four weeks’ from today by passing a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law and take appropriate action, if so required.
6. However, if, respondent No.2 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representation, the petitioner shall be informed as per mandate of law.
7. Petition stands disposed of.
8. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 23.07.2026
JUDGE S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.23 19:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document