Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9501 of 2025 Arising out of PS. Case No.-222 Year-2024 Thana- KUMAR KHAND District- Madhepura ====================================================== Gulab Devi W/o Jagdish Rishidev Resident of Village- Jorwaganj, Ward No. 10, P.S- Kumarkhand, District- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Prince Kumar Yadav @ Prince Kumar S/o Upendra Yadav R/o Village- Jo- rawarganj, P.S- Kumarkhand, Distt.- Madhepura. 3. Ajay Kumar S/o Chandar Yadav R/o Village- Jorawarganj, P.S- Kumark- hand, Distt.- Madhepura. 4. Rajesh Yadav S/o Ramdev Yadav R/o Village- Jorawarganj, P.S- Kumark- hand, Distt.- Madhepura. 5. Jasmil Mehta S/o Fulten Mehta R/o Village- Jorawarganj, P.S- Kumarkhand, Distt.- Madhepura. 6. Nunuwa Mehta @ Chandan Kumar Mehta @ Nunuya Mehta S/o Fulten Mehta R/o Village- Jorawarganj, P.S- Kumarkhand, Distt.- Madhepura. 7. Siyo Mehta @ Sudha Kant Kumar Mehta S/o Ramdev Mehta R/o Village- Jorawarganj, P.S- Kumarkhand, Distt.- Madhepura. 8. Mithu Mehta @ Pratap S/o Siyo Mehta R/o Village- Jorawarganj, P.S- Ku- markhand, Distt.- Madhepura. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, Advocate Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate Ms. Pooja Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Binay Krishna, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 3 12-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The present application for cancellation of provi- sional bail has been filed against the order dated 30.10.2024 passed by the learned Court of Additional Sessions Judge-I- cum-Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Madhepura in Cr. Misc. No. 192
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9501 of 2025(3) dt.12-01-2026 2/2 of 2024 arising out of Kumarkhand P.S. Case No. 222 of 2024 whereby and whereunder the provisional bail was granted to the opposite parties no. 2 to 8. 3. It has been submitted that the provisional bail was granted to the opposite parties till submission of charge-sheet, but the petitioner, being the informant of the case instituted un- der provisions of SC/ST Act, was not heard before passing of such order. 4. In such view of the matter, the petitioner is granted liberty to move the Court concerned which had granted the priv- ilege of provisional bail to the opposite parties by filing an ap- plication for cancellation of the provisional bail which would be filed within a period of two weeks from today.
If such an appli- cation is filed before the Court concerned, the same shall be dis- posed off within a period of four weeks thereafter. 5. With the aforesaid liberty, this application is dis- posed off. Vikash/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T