D/L76 21.08.2026 Bpg. C.R.M. (A) 2691 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Balurghat Police Station Case No.11 of 2026 dated 06.01.2026 under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/351(2)/103/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; Prodip Barman Versus The State of West Bengal Mr. Kaushik Choudhury Mr. Dwaipayan Panda. …for the petitioner. Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharya Ms. Priti Kar Bagchi. …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been foisted with the present criminal case. Learned advocate for the State submits that there are materials appearing against the petitioner including the dying declaration of the victim. According to the State, deceased has specifically pointed out relating to the relation as well as role of the present petitioner. Having regard to the same, I am of the opinion that this is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail to the present 2 petitioner. Accordingly, CRM(A)2691 of 2026 is dismissed. Memo of Evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)