Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33175 (KAR)

SRI LINGESH K S v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/9852/2026 · 2026-08-11

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 Reserved on :07.08.2026 Pronounced on :11.08.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9852 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SRI LINGESH K S, S/O LATE SRI SOMASHEKARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, EX- MLA OF BELUR ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCY, R/AT KARIKATTE HALLI, CHATCHATHAHALLI, PO: CHATCHATHAHALLI, DIST. HASSAN, KARNATAKA – 573 121. …PETITIONER (BY SRI ARUNA SHYAM M, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI DILIP KUMAR GOWDA R, ADVOCATE) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH BELURU PS, NOW INVESTIGATED BY CID, REPRESENTED BY SPP, CITY CIVIL COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU – 577 522. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI B.N.JAGADEESHA, SPP-I) Digitally signed by PADMAVATHI B K Location: High Court of Karnataka 2 THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 483 OF BNSS, 2023 TO ALLOW THIS CRL.P AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT POLICE TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON REGULAR BAIL IN CONNECTION WITH CRIME NO.98/2023 REGISTERED BY BELUR P.S. NOW INVESTIGATED BY CID FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 468, 464, 465, 471, 409, 420, 120 B OF THE IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED 42ND ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR ORDERS ON 07.08.2026, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CAV ORDER The petitioner, a former MLA of Belur Assembly Constituency is before the Court seeking his enlargement on bail for it having been turned down by the LXXXI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in Criminal Miscellaneous No.6401 of 2026 arising out of Crime No.98 of 2023 registered by Belur Police and pending before the 42nd Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru. 2. Heard Shri Aruna Shyam M., learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri B.N. Jagadeesha, learned State Public Prosecutor-1 appearing for the respondent. 3 3. Facts, in brief, germane are as follows: - The petitioner gets elected to the Karnataka Legislative Assembly from Belur Taluk and was an M.L.A. between 2018 and 2023. During his tenure as a legislator he was also the Chairman of the Bagair Hukum Committee, which was empowered to consider and grant of lands in terms of law. After his exist as an M.L.A., a private complaint comes to be registered against the petitioner and several others who were members of the said Bagair Hukum Committee on the score that about 1,430 persons were the beneficiaries valued at about 750 crores in the constituency and the present petitioner had bartered away the Government land close to 2,759 acres. The said private complaint was referred for investigation to the jurisdictional Police as obtaining under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. This was challenged before this Court in Criminal Petition No.5030 of 2023 by about 10 accused in the said proceedings including the petitioner. This Court had initially directed not to precipitate the matter way back in the year 2023 and the said order was in subsistence till the matter stood disposed 4 of on 13-09-2024. This Court by a detailed order rejected the petition that the Committee prima facie had acted contrary to law under the Chairmanship of the present petitioner. With the dismissal of the petition, the apprehension of arrest of the petitioner loomed. The petitioner was then taken into custody for the purpose of investigation and now is in judicial custody. The petitioner seeks enlargement on bail by filing Criminal Miscellaneous No.6401 of 2026 before the concerned Court. The concerned Court rejects the same. In the light of the said rejection, the petitioner has knocked at the doors of this Court in the subject petition. 4. The learned senior counsel Sri Aruna Shyam M., appearing for the petitioner would vehemently contend that the petitioner is taken into custody after two years of dismissal of the criminal petition for the purpose of investigation. He was the Chairman no doubt, but there were several other remedies available in law against the alleged action of the petitioner or the members of the Committee. Notwithstanding the same, the criminal law is set into motion. Setting the criminal law into motion has resulted in arrest 5 of the petitioner. Therefore, there is no warrant of retaining the petitioner in custody, more so, in the light of the fact that all the documents that are there are already seized. He would submit that in another 2 or 3 days, the petitioner would become entitled to statutory bail itself, as obtaining under Section 187 of the BNSS as the charge sheet is yet to be filed. The learned senior counsel on these grounds seek enlargement of the petitioner on grant of bail. 5. Per contra, the learned State Public Prosecutor Sri B.N. Jagadeesha appearing for the State would vehemently refute the submissions in contending that if the petitioner is let off on bail, he would undoubtedly indulge in tampering of documents, influencing the witnesses as he was a former M.L.A. and would undoubtedly yield such influence on the witnesses or officers who are holding the documents. In the teeth of grave allegations against the petitioner, the petitioner should not be released on bail. He would further contend that elaborate statement of objections has been filed as to why there has been delay. He submits that the matter is transferred to the CID and the CID has taken up the investigation now owing to the enormity of the crime. Therefore, 6 there has been certain delay in conduct and completion of investigation. That would not mean that the petitioner would be entitled to grant of bail. He would seek dismissal of the petition. 6. The learned senior counsel for the petitioner would join issue in projecting the health condition of the petitioner and his continuation in the prison would cause grave prejudice particularly to his health condition. On the aforesaid grounds as also on the health condition of the petitioner, who is now 70 years old, the learned senior counsel seeks enlargement of the petitioner on bail. 7. I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions made by the respective learned counsel and have perused the material on record. 8. The afore-narrated facts are a matter of record. The fulcrum of the lis lies in what is already held by this Court in Criminal Petition No.5030 of 2023, in which this Court has held as follows: “…. …. …. 8. The Samithi which is known as Bagair Hukum Saguvali Samithi was constituted for the purpose of regularization of lands by 7 unauthorized occupants as obtaining under Section 94A of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. The Chairman of the Samithi was the 1st petitioner, a then sitting Member of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly. In terms of the provisions of law, three members can be appointed to the Samithi. They were appointed by accused No.1. They are accused Nos. 2, 3 and 4; Accused Nos.5 to 10 are previous members of the Samithi and accused Nos.11 to 14 were Tahsildars working at the relevant point in time at Belur. The petitioners who have knocked at the doors of this Court are accused Nos.1 to 9. The Tahsildars are not before this Court. The Samithi assessed the applications submitted before it. There were 1430 applicants who wanted their unauthorized occupation to be regularized of about 2750 acres of Government lands as those applicants claimed that they were in unauthorized occupation of Government lands. The applicants are said to have given several documents in support of their claim. Those documents are alleged to be fictitious, fabricated and that they were never unauthorized occupants of Government lands. The lands are granted to those 1430 applicants ranging 2750 acres. 9. The smoke of illegality went up the air which led to an inquiry being conducted at the hands of the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner. The Assistant Commissioner directs the Tahsildar to submit a report after conduct of spot inspection of all the lands and verification of records. The Tahsildar conducts a spot inspection, draws up a report and submits the same to the Assistant Commissioner. The report of the Tahsildar reads as follows: “£ÀA. CwPÀæªÀÄt.12/20-21 ¢£ÁAPÀ:17/11/2020 f¯Áè¢üPÁjUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÁ¸À£À f¯Éè ºÁ¸À£À ªÀiÁ£ÀågÉ.... ಷಯ:- ೇಲೂರು ಾಲೂ ನ ಈ ಂೆ ನೆರುವ ಬಗ ಹುಕುಂ ಸಕಮ ಸ!"ಯ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ%ರುವ ಪಕರಣಗಳ ಹಲವ) ನೂ*ನ*ೆಗಳ+ ಕಂಡುಬಂರುವ ಬ-ೆ., 8 G¯ÉèÃR:- 1. /ಾನ* ಉಪ1ಾ-ಾ23ಾ4ಗಳ+, ಸಕ5ೇಶಪ)ರ ಉಪ1ಾಗ ಇವರ ¥ÀvÀæzÀ ¸ÀASÉå : J¯ï.J£ï.r 31/2019/2019-20 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 15/06/2019. 2. ೇಲೂರು ಾಲೂ ನ ಬಗಹುಕುಂ ಸಕಮ ಸ!"ಯು ರಚ9ೆ:ಾ%ರುವ ಬ-ೆ. ;ೊರ<=ದ ಸ3ಾ?ರದ ಆೇಶ ಸಂAೆ*: ಆ < 08 J¯ïfºÉZï 2020(¨sÁ-1), ¢£ÁAPÀ: 19/09/2020. 3. /ಾEಯ F5ಾ 23ಾ4ಗಳ ಪತದ ಸಂAೆ*: ಎJಎE <(2)61/2019-20, ¢£ÁAPÀ: 06/10/2019. ******** 1. Uೕಲಂಡ ಷಯ3ೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ 2017-20189ೇ Vಾನ ಸ4ಸು/ಾರು 859 ಪಕರಣಗಳ+ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ% ಹಕುಾಖಲು ಆಗೇ ¨Á ಇದುX, ಸದ4 ಪಕರಣಗಳನುY ಹಕುಾಖಲು ಕಮ ಜರು%ಸುವ ಬ-ೆ. ಕಡತವನುY ಪ4Zೕ=ಾಗ ಹಲವ) ನೂ*ನ*ೆಗಳ+ ಕಡತದ ಕಂಡುಬಂದುX, ಈ ನೂ*ನ*ೆಗ[-ೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಸೂಕ\ ]ೇಶನ 3ೋ4 /ಾನ* ಉಪ1ಾ-ಾ23ಾ4ಗ[-ೆ ಪತ ಬ$ೆಯ5ಾ%ದುX, /ಾನ* ಉಪ1ಾ-ಾ23ಾ4ಗಳ+ ಉ5ೆ ೕಖ(1)ರ ಪತದ ಹಕುಾಖಲು ಕಮ ಜರು%ಸಲು ಾ ಇರುವ ಕಡತಗ[-ೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ, ಕಡತವನುY ಮರು ಪ4Zೕ= ಸ^ಳ ತ]Aೆ ನೆ= ಮುಂೆ ರಚ9ೆ:ಾಗುವ ಬಗ ಹುಕು ಸಕಮ ಸ!"ಯ ಮುಂೆ ಮಂ<=, ಸ!"ಯ ಅನು`ೕದ9ೆಯನುY ಪೆದು ಹಕುಾಖಲು ಕಮ ಜರು%ಸುವ ಬ-ೆ. ಪತದ ಮೂಲಕ ]ೇ?ಶನ ]ೕ<ರುಾ\$ೆ. 2. ಉ5ೆ ೕಖ(2)ಮತು\ (3)ರಂೆ ೇಲೂರು ಾಲೂ ಕು ಬಗ ಹುಕುಂ ಸಕಮ ಸ!"ಯನುY ರಚ9ೆ /ಾ< ನಮೂ9ೆ-53ರ ಾ ಇರುವ ಅF?ಗಳನುY 5ೇaಾ4 /ಾಡುವ ಸಂಬಂಧ ಬಗ ಹುಕುಂ ಸಕಮ ಸ!"ಯ ಮುಂೆ ಮಂ<= ಕಮ3ೈ-ೊಳ+dವ ಬ-ೆ. ಉ5ೆ ೕeತ ಪತದ ಸೂf=ರುಾ\$ೆ. ಅದರಂೆ ಈ ಂೇ 859 ಪಕರಣಗಳ+ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ% ಹಕುಾಖಲು ಕಮ ಜರು%ಸೆ ಾ ಇರುವ ಪಕರಣಗ[-ೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ /ಾನ* ಉಪ1ಾ-ಾ23ಾ4ಗಳ+, ಸಕ5ೇಶಪ)ರ ಉಪ1ಾಗ ರವರ ]ೇ?ಶನದಂೆ ಕಡತವನುY ಮೊ\Ug ಪ4=ೕ=ಾಗ ಕಡತದ ಹಲವ) ನೂ*ನ*ೆಗಳ+ ಕಂಡುಬಂರುತ\ೆ. ಅದರ ಮುಖ*aಾ% ಮಂಜೂ4-ೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ಾಂೆ 9 ಕ9ಾ?ಟಕ ಭೂ ಕಂಾಯ 3ಾjX ಕಲಂ 94(ಎ) ಮತು\ 94(k)ರಂೆ ಮತು\ ಸ3ಾ?ರವ) 3ಾಲ3ಾಲ3ೆ ;ೊರ<=ರುವ ಸುೊ\ೕ5ೆಯಂೆ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ"-ೆ ಕಡತವನುY =ದlಪ<ಸೇ3ಾ%ದುX, =ದlಪ<=ದ ಕಡತವನುY ಬಗ ಹುಕುA ಸಕಮ ಸ!"ಯ ಮುಂೆ ಮಂ<= ಸ!"ಯ ಒಂದ9ೇ ಸು"\ೕನ ಸಕಮ 3ೋ4 ಅನು`ೕದ9ೆಯನುY ಪೆದು ನಮೂ9ೆ-54ರನುY -ಾಮದ ಪಚುರ ಪ<= ಮಂಜೂ4 ಪಕರಣ3ೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ :ಾವ)ೇ -ಾಮಸ^4ಂದ ಆnೇಪoೆಗಳ+ ಾರೇ ಇದX ಪ)ನಪಃ ಎರಡ9ೇ ಸು"\-ೆ ಸ!"ಯ ಮುಂೆ ಮಂ<= ಅನು`ೕದ9ೆ ಪೆದು ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ"-ೆ vÀUÀ®ÄªÀ ±ÀÄ®Ì ªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÁðgÀPÉÌ ¥ÁªÀw¹PÉÆAqÀÄ ªÀÄAdÆjzÁgÀjUÉ ¸ÁUÀĪÀ½aÃn ¤Ãr ºÀPÀÄÌzÁR®Ä PÀæªÀÄ ಜರು%ಸೇ3ಾ%ರುತ\ೆ ಇದೂ ಆನ2ೕಕೃತ Vಾಗುವ[ /ಾಡು"\ರುವವರ ಸಕಮ /ಾಡೇ3ಾ%ರುaಾಗ ಅನುಸ4ಸೇ3ಾದ ಕಮaಾ%ದುX, ಈ ಎ5ಾ ನಾವ[ಯನುY ಬಗ ಹುಕುಂ ಸಕಮ ಸ!"ಯ ನಾವ[ ªÀ»AiÀÄ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ PÀqÁØAiÀĪÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ, DzÀgÉ F »AzÉ ªÀÄAdÆgÁVgÀĪÀ 859 ಪಕರಣಗ[-ೆ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ ಸ!"ಯು ನೆರುವ ಬ-ೆ. ಕಡತದ ನಮೂ=ದುX, DzÀgÉ §UÀgï ºÀÄPÀÄÌA ¸ÀPÀæªÀÄ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄÄ £ÀqÉ¢gÀĪÀ §UÉÎ £ÀqÁªÀ½ ªÀ»AiÀİè AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà £ÀªÀÄÆzÀÄ Eರುವ)ಲ , ಇಂತಹ ಪಕರಣಗಳ+ F »AzÉ ªÀÄAdÆgÁVgÀĪÀ ಪಕರಣಗಳ PÀAqÀħA¢gÀÄvÀÛzÉ. EAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼ÀÆ PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸ÀĪÀ §UÉÎ /ಾನ* ಉಪ1ಾUÁ¢üPÁjUÀ¼À £ÀzÉñÀ£ÀzÀAvÉ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ಮಂ<= ಹಕುಾಖಲು ಕಮಜರು%ಸುವ ಬ-ೆ. ಅನು`ೕದ9ೆ ಪೆದು ಹಕುಾಖ5ೆ ಕಮ ಜರು%ಸ5ಾ%ರುತ\ೆ. 3. ೇಲೂರು ಾಲೂ ನ ರಚ9ೆ:ಾ%ರುವ §UÀgï ºÀÄPÀÄÌA ¸ÀPÀæªÀÄ ¸À«ÄwAiÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ªÀÄAr¸À®Ä F ಾಲೂನ ಒಟುr ನಮೂ9ೆ-53ರ 11275 ಅF?ಗಳ+ =sೕಕೃತ-ೊಂ<ದುX, ಅದರ ಈ ಂೇ ಒಟುr 3247 CfðUÀ¼ÀÄ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ%ದುX, 3457 ಅF?ಗಳ+ ಬಗ ಹುಕುಂ ಸಕಮ ಸ!"ಯ "ರಸvತ-ೊಂ<ದುX, 4571 ಅF?ಗಳ+ ಸ!"ಯ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ಮಂ<ಸಲು ಾ ಇರುವ)ಾ% ಪಗ" ವರಯನುY ಸ =ದುX, ಸದ4 ವರ 9ೆY5ೆಯ ಾ ಅF?ಗಳನುY ;ಾ ರಚ9ೆ:ಾ%ರುವ ಬಗ ಹುಕುಂ ಸಕಮ ಸ!"ಯ ಮುಂೆ ಮಂ<ಸಲು :ಾವ)ೇ ಮೂಲ ಅF?ಗಳ+ ಈ 3ಾ:ಾ?ಲಯದ aಾ*w\ಯ5ಾ ಗ, ಕxೇ4ಯ =ಬyಂಗzಾದ ಉಪತಹ=ೕ5ಾX, $ಾಜಸs ]4ೕ{ಕರು ಮತು\ -ಾಮ5ೆ3ಾ23ಾ4ಗಳ ಬ[ ಇರುವ)ಲ . ;ಾಗೂ ಸದ4 ಅF?ಗಳ =^"ಗಳ ಬ-ೆ. ಪ4Zೕಸಲು ;ಾ ಷಯ ವ ಇರುವ)ಲ . 10 4. ನಮೂ9ೆ-53ರ ಸಕಮ 3ೋ4 ಸ =ರುವ ಅF?ಗಳ ಆಾರದ Uೕ5ೆ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ" ಕಮ ನೆಸೇ3ಾ%ದುX, Uೕ5ೆ "[=ರುವಂೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ-53ರ =sೕಕೃ-ೊಂಡ ಅF?ಗಳ |ೈ ಾ ಅF?ಗಳ+ ಈ 3ಾಯ?ಲಯದ aಾ*w\ಯ ಲಭ*ರುವ)ಲ ಆದ$ೆ =sೕಕೃತ-ೊಂಡ ಅF?ಗಳನುY ವಯ ನಮೂದು /ಾ<ದುX, ಸದ4 ವಯ ಆಾರದ Uೕ5ೆ ಸಕಮ 3ಾಯ? ಈ ಂೆ ನೆಸ5ಾ%ರುತ\ೆ, ಆದ$ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ-53ರ ವಯ 3ೆಲ -ಾಮಗಳ ;ಾzೆ ಹ4ದು;ೋ%ದುX, ಇದ4ಂದ ಅF?ಗಳ ವರಗಳ+ ಾಖ5ಾ%ರುವ ಬ-ೆ. ಪ4Zೕಸಲು Vಾಧ*aಾಗು"\ರುವ)ಲ . ಉಾಹರoೆ-ೆ ೇಲೂರು ಾಲೂ ಕು ಕಸಾ ;ೋಬ[-ೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ- 53ರ ವ ಈ 3ೆಳಕಂಡಂೆ ಇರುತ\ೆ. xxxxxxx 5. ನªÀÄÆ£É-53gÀ°è ¹éÃಕೃತ-ೊಂ<ರುವ ಅF?ಗಳ+ ಲಭ*ರುವ)ಲ . ನಮು9ೆ-53ರ ವಯು ಸಹ 3ೆಲªÀÅ ºÁ¼ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÀjzÀÄ ;ೋ%ರುತ\ೆ. ;ಾಗೂ E£ÀÆß PÉ®ªÀÅ UÁæªÀUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀA§A¢¹zÀAvÉ ¸ÀzÀj UÁæªÀÄPÉÌ ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ PÉÆÃj ಬಂದಂತಹ CfðUÀ¼À£ÀÄß CA¢£À vÀºÀ¹Ã¯ÁÝgïgÀªÀgÀÄ F UÁæªÀÄPÉÌ ªÀÄAdÆw PÉÆÃj EµÀÄÖ CfðUÀ¼ÀÄ §A¢gÀĪÀÅzÁV zÀÈrüÃPÀj¹gÀĪÀÅ¢®è, PÉ®ªÀÅ UÁæªÀÄUÀ¼À°è ತಹ=ೕ5ಾX ರವರು zÀÈrüÃPÀj¹zÀgÉ ಇನೂY ªÀÄÄAzÉ CfðUÀ¼ÀÄ §A¢gÀĪÀÅzÁV £ÀªÀÄÆzÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ, ªÀ»AiÀÄ°è §gÉ¢gÀĪÀªÀgÀ §gÀºÀªÀÅ ¸ÀºÀ MAzÀPÉÆÌAzÀÄ vÁ¼É EgÀĪÀÅ¢®è ಈ CA±À¢AzÀ ªÀÄAdÆjUÉ CAvÀºÀ CfðUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀjUÀt¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÁUÀ vÀÄA¨Á -ೊಂದಲ GAmÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ, F UÉÆAzÀ®PÉÌ PÁgÀt CfðUÀ¼ÀÄ ಲಭ*ಲ ೇ EgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ. 6. ಸ3ಾ?ರದ ಸ3ಾ?ರದ ಸ3ಾ?ರದ ಸ3ಾ?ರದ ಸುೊ\ೕ5ೆಯಂೆ ಸುೊ\ೕ5ೆಯಂೆ ಸುೊ\ೕ5ೆಯಂೆ ಸುೊ\ೕ5ೆಯಂೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ-53ರ ರ ರ ರ =sೕಕೃತ-ೊಂ<ರುವ =sೕಕೃತ-ೊಂ<ರುವ =sೕಕೃತ-ೊಂ<ರುವ =sೕಕೃತ-ೊಂ<ರುವ ಅF?ಗಳ+ ಅF?ಗಳ+ ಅF?ಗಳ+ ಅF?ಗಳ+ ಲಭ*ಲ ೇ ಲಭ*ಲ ೇ ಲಭ*ಲ ೇ ಲಭ*ಲ ೇ ಇದX ಇದX ಇದX ಇದX ಪ{ದ ಪ{ದ ಪ{ದ ಪ{ದ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ-53ರರರರ 4Fಸr 4Fಸr 4Fಸr 4Fಸrನ ನ ನ ನ ನಮೂಾ%ರ ನಮೂಾ%ರ ನಮೂಾ%ರ ನಮೂಾ%ರªÀÅzÀgÀ DzsÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É GzsÀÈvÀ £ÀPÀ®Ä ¥Àæw¬ÄAzÀ PÀqÀvÀzÀ £ÀqÁªÀ½ ನೆಸುವಂೆ ನೆಸುವಂೆ ನೆಸುವಂೆ ನೆಸುವಂೆ ]ೇ?ಶನರುತ\ರ ]ೇ?ಶನರುತ\ರ ]ೇ?ಶನರುತ\ರ ]ೇ?ಶನರುತ\ರ. ªÀÄÆ® CfðUÀ¼ÀÄ ಲಭ*ರುವ)ಲ ಲಭ*ರುವ)ಲ ಲಭ*ರುವ)ಲ ಲಭ*ರುವ)ಲ ;ಾಗೂ ;ಾಗೂ ;ಾಗೂ ;ಾಗೂ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ-53ರರರರ ವಯನುY ವಯನುY ವಯನುY ವಯನುY ಸಮಪ?ಕaಾ% ಸಮಪ?ಕaಾ% ಸಮಪ?ಕaಾ% ಸಮಪ?ಕaಾ% ]ವ?ಸೆ ]ವ?ಸೆ ]ವ?ಸೆ ]ವ?ಸೆ ಇರುವ)ದ4ಂದ ಇರುವ)ದ4ಂದ ಇರುವ)ದ4ಂದ ಇರುವ)ದ4ಂದ ಾಖ5ಾ%ರುವ ಾಖ5ಾ%ರುವ ಾಖ5ಾ%ರುವ ಾಖ5ಾ%ರುವ ಅF?ಗಳ ಅF?ಗಳ ಅF?ಗಳ ಅF?ಗಳ /ಾ"ಯನುY /ಾ"ಯನುY /ಾ"ಯನುY /ಾ"ಯನುY ಕ$ಾರು ಕ$ಾರು ಕ$ಾರು ಕ$ಾರು ಒಕ-ಾ% ಒಕ-ಾ% ಒಕ-ಾ% ಒಕ-ಾ% 11 ಗುರು"ಸಲು ಗುರು"ಸಲು ಗುರು"ಸಲು ಗುರು"ಸಲು Vಾಧ*aಾಗು Vಾಧ*aಾಗು Vಾಧ*aಾಗು Vಾಧ*aಾಗು"\ರುವ)ಲ "\ರುವ)ಲ "\ರುವ)ಲ "\ರುವ)ಲ , 3ಾರಣ 3ಾರಣ 3ಾರಣ 3ಾರಣ ವಯ ನ ವಯ ನ ವಯ ನ ವಯ ನ ;ಾzೆಗಳ+ ;ಾzೆಗಳ+ ;ಾzೆಗಳ+ ;ಾzೆಗಳ+ ಹ4ದು;ೊ%ದುX ಹ4ದು;ೊ%ದುX ಹ4ದು;ೊ%ದುX ಹ4ದು;ೊ%ದುX ;ಾಗೂ ;ಾಗೂ ;ಾಗೂ ;ಾಗೂ ವಯ ವಯ ವಯ ವಯ ಅF?ಗಳ+ ಅF?ಗಳ+ ಅF?ಗಳ+ ಅF?ಗಳ+ ಬಂರುವ ಬಂರುವ ಬಂರುವ ಬಂರುವ ಬ-ೆ. ಬ-ೆ. ಬ-ೆ. ಬ-ೆ. ದೃ}ೕಕ4ಸೇ ದೃ}ೕಕ4ಸೇ ದೃ}ೕಕ4ಸೇ ದೃ}ೕಕ4ಸೇ ಇರುವ)ದ4ಂದ ಇರುವ)ದ4ಂದ ಇರುವ)ದ4ಂದ ಇರುವ)ದ4ಂದ. 7. 2017ರರರರ /ಾಚ? /ಾಚ? /ಾಚ? /ಾಚ? ನಂತರ ನಂತರ ನಂತರ ನಂತರ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಾಲೂ ನ ಾಲೂ ನ ಾಲೂ ನ ಾಲೂ ನ ಹಲವ) ಹಲವ) ಹಲವ) ಹಲವ) ಪಕರಣಗಳ+ ಪಕರಣಗಳ+ ಪಕರಣಗಳ+ ಪಕರಣಗಳ+ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ%ದುX ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ%ದುX ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ%ದುX ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ%ದುX, ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ-53ರ ರ ರ ರ =sೕಕೃತ-ೊಂ<ರುವ =sೕಕೃತ-ೊಂ<ರುವ =sೕಕೃತ-ೊಂ<ರುವ =sೕಕೃತ-ೊಂ<ರುವ ಅF?ಗಳ+ ಅF?ಗಳ+ ಅF?ಗಳ+ ಅF?ಗಳ+ ಪಗ" ಪಗ" ಪಗ" ಪಗ" ಬ-ೆ. ಬ-ೆ. ಬ-ೆ. ಬ-ೆ. ಈ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಕxೇ4ಯ ಕxೇ4ಯ ಕxೇ4ಯ ಕxೇ4ಯ :ಾವ)ೇ :ಾವ)ೇ :ಾವ)ೇ :ಾವ)ೇ ವ ವ ವ ವ ಇ~r ಇ~r ಇ~r ಇ~rಲ ೇ ಲ ೇ ಲ ೇ ಲ ೇ ಇರುವ)ದ4ಂದ ಇರುವ)ದ4ಂದ ಇರುವ)ದ4ಂದ ಇರುವ)ದ4ಂದ ಅF?ಗಳ ಅF?ಗಳ ಅF?ಗಳ ಅF?ಗಳ =^" =^" =^" =^" ಬ-ೆ. ಬ-ೆ. ಬ-ೆ. ಬ-ೆ. ]2?ಷraಾ% ]2?ಷraಾ% ]2?ಷraಾ% ]2?ಷraಾ% ಅF?ಗಳ ಅF?ಗಳ ಅF?ಗಳ ಅF?ಗಳ 5ೇaಾ4 5ೇaಾ4 5ೇaಾ4 5ೇaಾ4 ಬ-ೆ. ಬ-ೆ. ಬ-ೆ. ಬ-ೆ. /ಾ" /ಾ" /ಾ" /ಾ" ]ೕಡಲು ]ೕಡಲು ]ೕಡಲು ]ೕಡಲು Vಾಧ*aಾಗು"\ರುವ)ಲ Vಾಧ*aಾಗು"\ರುವ)ಲ Vಾಧ*aಾಗು"\ರುವ)ಲ Vಾಧ*aಾಗು"\ರುವ)ಲ , ಈ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಒಂೇ ಒಂೇ ಒಂೇ ಒಂೇ 5ೇaಾ4 5ೇaಾ4 5ೇaಾ4 5ೇaಾ4 ಅF?ಗ[-ೆ ಅF?ಗ[-ೆ ಅF?ಗ[-ೆ ಅF?ಗ[-ೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಸಂಪ•ಣ? ಸಂಪ•ಣ? ಸಂಪ•ಣ? ಸಂಪ•ಣ? ಕಡತಗಳ+ ಕಡತಗಳ+ ಕಡತಗಳ+ ಕಡತಗಳ+ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಈ 3ಾಯ?ಲಯದ 3ಾಯ?ಲಯದ 3ಾಯ?ಲಯದ 3ಾಯ?ಲಯದ ಲಭ*ರುವ)ಲ ಲಭ*ರುವ)ಲ ಲಭ*ರುವ)ಲ ಲಭ*ರುವ)ಲ , 8. ಅನ2ಕೃತ ಅನ2ಕೃತ ಅನ2ಕೃತ ಅನ2ಕೃತ Vಾಗುವ[ Vಾಗುವ[ Vಾಗುವ[ Vಾಗುವ[ ಸಕಮ ಸಕಮ ಸಕಮ ಸಕಮ 3ೋ4 3ೋ4 3ೋ4 3ೋ4 ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ-53ರ ರ ರ ರ ಅF? ಅF? ಅF? ಅF? ಪ4Zೕಸ ಪ4Zೕಸ ಪ4Zೕಸ ಪ4Zೕಸಲು ಲು ಲು ಲು 9ಾಂಕ 9ಾಂಕ 9ಾಂಕ 9ಾಂಕ: 30/04/1999 ರಂದು ರಂದು ರಂದು ರಂದು ಕೆ ಕೆ ಕೆ ಕೆ 9ಾಂಕaಾ%ರುತ\ೆ 9ಾಂಕaಾ%ರುತ\ೆ 9ಾಂಕaಾ%ರುತ\ೆ 9ಾಂಕaಾ%ರುತ\ೆ, ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ-50ರ ರ ರ ರ ಅF? ಅF? ಅF? ಅF? ಸ ಸೇ ಸ ಸೇ ಸ ಸೇ ಸ ಸೇ ಇದX ಇದX ಇದX ಇದX ಪ{ದ ಪ{ದ ಪ{ದ ಪ{ದ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ-53ರ ರ ರ ರ ಅF? ಅF? ಅF? ಅF? ಸ ಸಲು ಸ ಸಲು ಸ ಸಲು ಸ ಸಲು ಸ3ಾ?ರವ) ಸ3ಾ?ರವ) ಸ3ಾ?ರವ) ಸ3ಾ?ರವ) ಅವ3ಾಶ ಅವ3ಾಶ ಅವ3ಾಶ ಅವ3ಾಶ ಕ€ಸ5ಾ%ೆ ಕ€ಸ5ಾ%ೆ ಕ€ಸ5ಾ%ೆ ಕ€ಸ5ಾ%ೆ ಅಂದ$ೆ ಅಂದ$ೆ ಅಂದ$ೆ ಅಂದ$ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ-50ರ ರ ರ ರ ಅF? ಅF? ಅF? ಅF? ಸ ಸಲು ಸ ಸಲು ಸ ಸಲು ಸ ಸಲು ಫಲ$ಾದವ4-ೆ ಫಲ$ಾದವ4-ೆ ಫಲ$ಾದವ4-ೆ ಫಲ$ಾದವ4-ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ-53ರ ರ ರ ರ ಅF? ಅF? ಅF? ಅF? ಸ ಸಲು ಸ ಸಲು ಸ ಸಲು ಸ ಸಲು ಅವ3ಾಶದುX ಅವ3ಾಶದುX ಅವ3ಾಶದುX ಅವ3ಾಶದುX, 19879ೇ 9ೇ 9ೇ 9ೇ Vಾ]ಂದ Vಾ]ಂದ Vಾ]ಂದ Vಾ]ಂದಲು ಲು ಲು ಲು ಮಂಜೂ4-ೆ ಮಂಜೂ4-ೆ ಮಂಜೂ4-ೆ ಮಂಜೂ4-ೆ 3ೋ4ರುವ 3ೋ4ರುವ 3ೋ4ರುವ 3ೋ4ರುವ ಪೇಶದ ಪೇಶದ ಪೇಶದ ಪೇಶದ ಅನುಭವದ ರೇಕು ಅನುಭವದ ರೇಕು ಅನುಭವದ ರೇಕು ಅನುಭವದ ರೇಕು, ಮಂಜೂ4-ೆ ಮಂಜೂ4-ೆ ಮಂಜೂ4-ೆ ಮಂಜೂ4-ೆ 3ೋ4ರುವ 3ೋ4ರುವ 3ೋ4ರುವ 3ೋ4ರುವ ಅF?ಾರರು ಅF?ಾರರು ಅF?ಾರರು ಅF?ಾರರು ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ-53ರ ರ ರ ರ ಅF? ಅF? ಅF? ಅF? ಸ ಸಲು ಸ ಸಲು ಸ ಸಲು ಸ ಸಲು ]ಗ2ಪ<=ರುವ ]ಗ2ಪ<=ರುವ ]ಗ2ಪ<=ರುವ ]ಗ2ಪ<=ರುವ ಕೆ ಕೆ ಕೆ ಕೆ 9ಾಂಕೊಳ-ೆ 9ಾಂಕೊಳ-ೆ 9ಾಂಕೊಳ-ೆ 9ಾಂಕೊಳ-ೆ ಅF? ಅF? ಅF? ಅF? ಸ ಸೇಕು ಸ ಸೇಕು ಸ ಸೇಕು ಸ ಸೇಕು. ಕ9ಾ?ಟಕ ಕ9ಾ?ಟಕ ಕ9ಾ?ಟಕ ಕ9ಾ?ಟಕ ಭೂ ಭೂ ಭೂ ಭೂ ಕಂಾಯ ಕಂಾಯ ಕಂಾಯ ಕಂಾಯ 3ಾjX 3ಾjX 3ಾjX 3ಾjX ಕಲಂ ಕಲಂ ಕಲಂ ಕಲಂ 94(ಎಎಎಎ) ಮತು\ ಮತು\ ಮತು\ ಮತು\ 94(kkkk)ರಂೆ ರಂೆ ರಂೆ ರಂೆ ಆಆಆಆ ವಷ?3ೆ ವಷ?3ೆ ವಷ?3ೆ ವಷ?3ೆ ಅವ4-ೆ ಅವ4-ೆ ಅವ4-ೆ ಅವ4-ೆ 18 ವಷ? ವಷ? ವಷ? ವಷ? ವ‚ೕ!" ವ‚ೕ!" ವ‚ೕ!" ವ‚ೕ!" ;ೊಂರೇಕು ;ೊಂರೇಕು ;ೊಂರೇಕು ;ೊಂರೇಕು ;ಾಗೂ ;ಾಗೂ ;ಾಗೂ ;ಾಗೂ ಮಂ ಮಂ ಮಂ ಮಂಜೂ4-ೆ ಜೂ4-ೆ ಜೂ4-ೆ ಜೂ4-ೆ 3ೋ4ರುವ 3ೋ4ರುವ 3ೋ4ರುವ 3ೋ4ರುವ ಪೇಶದ ಪೇಶದ ಪೇಶದ ಪೇಶದ ಮಂಜೂ4ಾರರು ಮಂಜೂ4ಾರರು ಮಂಜೂ4ಾರರು ಮಂಜೂ4ಾರರು 1987£Éà ¸Á°¤AzÀ®Ä ªÀÄAdÆjUÉ PÉÆÃjgÀĪÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀzÀ°è C£ÀĨsÀªÀzÀ°ègÀ¨ÉÃPÀÄ, ªÀÄAdÆjUÉ PÉÆÃjgÀĪÀ CfðzÁgÀgÀÄ £ÀªÀÄÆ£É-53gÀ°è Cfð ¸À°è¸À®Ä ¤UÀ¢ü¥Àr¹gÀĪÀ PÀqÉ ¢£ÁAPÀzÉÆ¼ÀUÉ Cfð ¸À°è¸À¨ÉÃPÀÄ, PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¨sÀÆ PÀAzÁAiÀÄ PÁAiÉÄ PÀ®A 94(J) ªÀÄvÀÄ 94 (©)gÀAvÉ D ªÀµÀðPÉÌ CªÀjUÉ 18 ªÀµÀð ªÀAiÉÆÃ«Äw ºÉÆA¢gÀ¨ÉÃPÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ ªÀÄAdÆjUÉ PÉÆÃ¢gÀĪÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀzÀ°è ªÀÄAdÆjzÁgÀgÀÄ 1987£Éà ¸Á°¤AzÀ®Æ ಸತತaಾ% ಸತತaಾ% ಸತತaಾ% ಸತತaಾ% ಉಳ+U ಉಳ+U ಉಳ+U ಉಳ+U /ಾ<3ೊಂ<ರತಕದುX /ಾ<3ೊಂ<ರತಕದುX /ಾ<3ೊಂ<ರತಕದುX /ಾ<3ೊಂ<ರತಕದುX, ಈ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಂೇ ಂೇ ಂೇ ಂೇ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ%ರುವ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ%ರುವ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ%ರುವ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ%ರುವ ಪಕರಣಗಳ ಪಕರಣಗಳ ಪಕರಣಗಳ ಪಕರಣಗಳ ಕಡತಗಳನುY ಕಡತಗಳನುY ಕಡತಗಳನುY ಕಡತಗಳನುY ಪ4Zೕ=ಾಗ ಪ4Zೕ=ಾಗ ಪ4Zೕ=ಾಗ ಪ4Zೕ=ಾಗ 19879ೇ 9ೇ 9ೇ 9ೇ Vಾನ Vಾನ Vಾನ Vಾನ ಅಪ|ಾ\ತ ಅಪ|ಾ\ತ ಅಪ|ಾ\ತ ಅಪ|ಾ\ತ ವಯಸರವ4ಗೂ ವಯಸರವ4ಗೂ ವಯಸರವ4ಗೂ ವಯಸರವ4ಗೂ ಸಹ ಸಹ ಸಹ ಸಹ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ"-ೆ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ"-ೆ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ"-ೆ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ"-ೆ ಪ4ಗƒಸ5ಾ%ೆ ಪ4ಗƒಸ5ಾ%ೆ ಪ4ಗƒಸ5ಾ%ೆ ಪ4ಗƒಸ5ಾ%ೆ, ಕ9ಾ?ಟಕ ಕ9ಾ?ಟಕ ಕ9ಾ?ಟಕ ಕ9ಾ?ಟಕ ಭೂ ಭೂ ಭೂ ಭೂ ಕಂಾಯ ಕಂಾಯ ಕಂಾಯ ಕಂಾಯ 3ಾjX 3ಾjX 3ಾjX 3ಾjX ಕಲಂ ಕಲಂ ಕಲಂ ಕಲಂ 94(ಎಎಎಎ) ಮತು\ ಮತು\ ಮತು\ ಮತು\ 94(kkkk) ರನsಯ ರನsಯ ರನsಯ ರನsಯ ಮತು\ ಮತು\ ಮತು\ ಮತು\ ಸ3ಾ?ರವ) ಸ3ಾ?ರವ) ಸ3ಾ?ರವ) ಸ3ಾ?ರವ) 3ಾಲ 3ಾಲ 3ಾಲ 3ಾಲ 3ಾಲ3ೆ 3ಾಲ3ೆ 3ಾಲ3ೆ 3ಾಲ3ೆ ;ೊರ<=ರುವ ;ೊರ<=ರುವ ;ೊರ<=ರುವ ;ೊರ<=ರುವ ]ಯಮಗಳ ]ಯಮಗಳ ]ಯಮಗಳ ]ಯಮಗಳ ಅ<ಯ ಅ<ಯ ಅ<ಯ ಅ<ಯ ಮಂಜೂ4 ಮಂಜೂ4 ಮಂಜೂ4 ಮಂಜೂ4 ಕಮ ಕಮ ಕಮ ಕಮ 3ೈ-ೊಳdೇ3ಾ%ರುತ\ೆ 3ೈ-ೊಳdೇ3ಾ%ರುತ\ೆ 3ೈ-ೊಳdೇ3ಾ%ರುತ\ೆ 3ೈ-ೊಳdೇ3ಾ%ರುತ\ೆ ಆದ$ೆ ಆದ$ೆ ಆದ$ೆ ಆದ$ೆ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಂೇ ಂೇ ಂೇ ಂೇ ಇಂತಹ ಇಂತಹ ಇಂತಹ ಇಂತಹ ಪಕರಣಗಳನುY ಪಕರಣಗಳನುY ಪಕರಣಗಳನುY ಪಕರಣಗಳನುY ಮಂಜೂರು ಮಂಜೂರು ಮಂಜೂರು ಮಂಜೂರು /ಾ<ರುಾ\$ೆ /ಾ<ರುಾ\$ೆ /ಾ<ರುಾ\$ೆ /ಾ<ರುಾ\$ೆ. 12 9. 12 9. ಭೂ ಕಂಾಯ 3ಾjX 94 ರಂೆ ಮತು\ ಸ3ಾ?ರದ ಆೇಶ ಸಂAೆ*: ಆ<168 ಎJFw 2014, 17/03/2018ರ ಆೇಶದಂೆ ಪ)ರಸ1ೆ aಾ*w\„ಂದ 3.!ೕ ಒಳ-ೆ ಬರುವ ಜ!ೕನುಗಳನುY ಮಂಜೂರು /ಾಡಲು ಅವ3ಾಶರುವ)ಲ , ಇಂತಹ ಅಂತರವನುY ರVೆ\ /ಾಗ?aಾ% ಆಗುವಂತಹ ದೂರವನುY ಪ4ಗƒಸೇ3ೆ ಅಥaಾ 9ೇರ ಅಂತರವನುY (ಏ4ಯJ <VೆrE‡ ) ಗಣ9ೆ-ೆ ೆ-ೆದು3ೊಳdೇಕು ಎಂಬ ಅಂಶದ ಬ-ೆ. ಸ3ಾ?ರವ) ]ೇ?ಶನ ]ೕ<ದುX, ಈ ಬ-ೆ. ಪ)ರಸ1ೆ aಾ*w\„ಂದ ಮಂಜೂ4-ೆ 3ೋ4ರುವ ಜ!ೕ]-ೆ 9ೇರ ಅಂತರದ 3 .!ೕ ಒಳ-ೆ ಬರುವಂತಹ ಜ!ೕನುಗಳನುY ಮಂಜೂರು /ಾಡಲು ಅವ3ಾಶರುವ)ಲ ಆದ$ೆ ಈ ಂೆ ಇಂತಹ ಪಕರಣಗಳನುY ಸಹ ಬಗಹುಕುಂ ಸಕಮ ಸ!"ಯ ಮಂಜೂರು /ಾ< Vಾಗುವ[ fೕ~ ಸಹ ]ೕ<ರುಾ\$ೆ. ಆದ$ೆ ಇಂತಹ ಪಕರಣಗಳ+ ಹಕುಾಖ5ಾ%ರುವ)ಲ . PÀ¸À¨Á ºÉÆÃ§½AiÀÄ ¨ÉîÆgÀÄ vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ ¥ÀÄgÀ¸À¨É ªÁå¦Û¬ÄAzÀ 3..!ೕ ಒಳ-ೆ ಬರುವ ಕಡತಗಳ ವರ PÀæ.¸ÀA ªÀÄAdÆjzÁgÀgÀ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ UÁæªÀÄ ¸À.£ÀA «¹ÛÃtð µÀgÁ 1 ¸À.©.¸ÀwÃ±ï ©£ï ¨sÀzÉÃUËqÀ /ಾನ3ೆ$ೆ 22 0.20 2 ¤Aಗ$ಾಜು kE ಸಗನಯ* /ಾನ3ೆ$ೆ 22 0.20 3 'ಮಲ ಮg 3ೋಂ' ಮ;ಾಂಗಯ* /ಾನ3ೆ$ೆ 22 20 1.00 4 gÀAUÀ£ÁxÀ ©£ï ®PÀëAiÀÄå /ಾನ3ೆ$ೆ 22 0.20 5 zÉêÉÃAzÀæ ©£ï ºÀ£ÀĪÀÄAvÀAiÀÄå §AmÉãÀºÀ½î 100 1.10 6 ®°vÀªÀÄä PÉÆÃA gÁªÀĸÁé«Ä §AmÉãÀºÀ½î 100 1.10 7 ªÀÄAdAiÀÄå ©£ï ¸ÀUÀ£ÀAiÀÄå qÀuÁAiÀÄÌ£ÀºÀ½î 52 0.35 8 PÀĪÀiÁgÀ ©£ï wgÀĪÀÄ®èAiÀÄå qÀuÁAiÀÄÌ£ÀºÀ½î 52 1.06 ¸ÀzÀj ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼ÀÄ F »AzÉ ªÀÄAdÆgÁVzÀÄÝ DzÀgÉ ºÀPÀÄÌzÁR¯ÁVgÀĪÀÅ ¢®è ¸ÀzÀj ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼ÀÄ ºÀPÀÄÌzÁR®Ä PÀæªÀÄ 13 9 ªÀÄjAiÀÄAiÀÄå ©£ï ¹zÀÝAiÀÄå qÀuÁAiÀÄÌ£ÀºÀ½î 120 2.06 10 «ÃgÀ¨sÀzÀæAiÀÄå ©£ï zÉÆqÀØAiÀÄå qÀuÁAiÀÄÌ£ÀºÀ½î 120 1.16 11 ZÀAzÀæAiÀÄå ©£ï ºÀÄZÀÑ®PÀÌAiÀÄå qÀuÁAiÀÄÌ£ÀºÀ½î 120 0.23 12 ªÀįÉèÃ±ï ©£ï ZÀ£ÉßÃUËqÀ qÀuÁAiÀÄÌ£ÀºÀ½î 120 0.37 13 JA.r FgÀ£ÁAiÀÄÌ ©£ï zÁåªÀ£ÁAiÀÄÌ ªÀÄÄ¢UÉgÉ 109 0.13 14 PÀĪÀiÁgÀ ©£ï ªÀÄÄzÀÝtUËqÀ ªÀÄÄ¢UÉgÉ 109 0.15 15 ¸ÀÄzsÁ PÉÆÃA ±ÀAPÀgÉÃUËqÀ ªÀÄÄ¢UÉgÉ 109 0.15 16 D£ÀAzÀ ©£ï gÀÄzÀæ¥Àà ªÀÄÄ¢UÉgÉ 109 0.34 17 aPÀÌAiÀÄå ©£ï ¹zÀÝAiÀÄå gÁAiÀÄ¥ÀÄgÀ 19 1.00 18 Dgï.J£ï £ÁUÉÃ±ï ©£ï Dgï.J¸ï £ÁUÀgÁdÄ gÁAiÀÄ¥ÀÄgÀ 19 2.17 ಜರು%ಸೇ3ಾದ$ೆ Uೕಲಂಡ ಸ3ಾ?ರದ ಆೇಶವ) ಅನsಯaಾಗುತ\ೆ. Šೇಷaಾ% ಕಸಾ ;ೋಬ[ ಎ‹.ಶಂಭುಗನಹ[d -ಾಮ3ೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ 9ಾಂಕ: 11-02-1994gÀ ನಾವ[ಯಂೆ ಒಟುr 51 ಜನ4-ೆ ಬಗಹುಕುಂ ಸಕಮ ಸ!"ಯ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ%ದುX, ಈ |ೈ 31 ಜನ4-ೆ ಈ ಂೇ 2017-20189ೇ Vಾನ Vಾಗುವ[ fೕ~ ಸಹ ತ4=ರುಾ\$ೆ. ಆದ$ೆ ಸದ4ಯವ4 ಹಕುಾಖ5ಾ%ರುವ)ಲ , ಈ ಪಕರಣವನುY ಪ4Zೕ=ಾಗ ಸದ4 ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ"ಯನುY /ಾತ F5ಾ 23ಾ4ಗಳ+ ಆೇಶ ಸಂAೆ*: ಆ.ಎ53-57/98-99, 9ಾಂಕ: 30/06/2003 ರಂದು ವŒಾ-ೊ½¹, ಆೇಶದ ಸದ4 -ಾಮ3ೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಅನುಭವ ಆ•ಾರದ Uೕ5ೆ ಪ)ನಹಃ ಬಗ ಹುಕುಂ ಸಕಮ ಸ!"ಯ ಮುಂೆ ಮಂ<= ಮಂಜೂ4 ಬ-ೆ. ಕಮ 3ೈ-ೊಳ+dವಂೆ ]ೇ?Z= ಆೇZ=ದುX, ಆದ$ೆ F ಂೆ ಆ%ರುವ ಸ!"ಯ ನಾವ[ಯಂೆ Vಾಗುವ[ fೕ~ ತ4=ರುಾ\$ೆ. ಈ -ಾಮವ) ಸಹ ಪ)ರಸ¨sÉ aಾ*w\„ಂದ ಸು/ಾರು 2.!ೕ ದೂರaಾಗುತ\ೆ, ಈ ಪಕರಣಗ[-ೆ ಹಕುಾಖಲು ನೆಸಲು ಈ ತರºÀ ನೂ*ನ*ೆಗಳ+ ಈ ಪಕರಣದ ಕಂಡುಬಂರುತ\ೆ. 14 10. ನಮೂ9ೆ-53ರ =sೕಕೃತ-ೊಂ<ರುವ ಅF?ಗಳನುY 5ೇaಾ4 /ಾಡುವ ಸಂಬಂಧ ಎ5ಾ ಅF?ಗಳ+£ÀÄß ಪ4ಗƒ= ಭೂಕಂಾಯ 3ಾjX 94(ಎ) ಮತು\ 94(k) ;ಾಗೂ ]ಯಮ 97ರ ನ ಅಂಶಗಳನುY ಗƒ£ÉUÉ ೆ-ೆದು3ೊಂಡು ಕಡತದ ನಾವ[ ನೆಸೇ3ಾ%ದುX, ಆದ$ೆ ಒಂದು -ಾಮ3ೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಒಂzÉ ಕಡತದ ನಾವ[ ನೆ= ಅF?ಗಳನುY 5ೇaಾ4 /ಾಡೇ3ಾ%ದುX, ಅದರ ಈ ಂೆ ಸ!"ಯ ಒಂದು ಅF?-ೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಕಡತ ನಾವ[ ನೆ=ದುX, ಇದ4ಂದ ಒಟುr =\ೕಣ?3ೆ ಾzೆ ಇಲ zÀAvÉ ªÀÄAdÆgÁw ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ. GzÁºÀgÀuÉUÉ PÀ¸À¨Á ºÉÆÃ§½ f9ೆYೕನಹ[d f9ೆYೕನಹ[d f9ೆYೕನಹ[d f9ೆYೕನಹ[d -ಾಮದ -ಾಮದ -ಾಮದ -ಾಮದ ಸಸಸಸ.ನಂ ನಂ ನಂ ನಂ 150 ಈ ಈ ಈ ಈ 3ೆಳಕಂಡವ4-ೆ 3ೆಳಕಂಡವ4-ೆ 3ೆಳಕಂಡವ4-ೆ 3ೆಳಕಂಡವ4-ೆ ಮಂಜೂರು ಮಂಜೂರು ಮಂಜೂರು ಮಂಜೂರು /ಾ<ದುX /ಾ<ದುX /ಾ<ದುX /ಾ<ದುX, ಈ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಪಕರಣಗ[-ೆ ಪಕರಣಗ[-ೆ ಪಕರಣಗ[-ೆ ಪಕರಣಗ[-ೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ನೂ*ನ*ೆಗಳ+ ನೂ*ನ*ೆಗಳ+ ನೂ*ನ*ೆಗಳ+ ನೂ*ನ*ೆಗಳ+ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಈ 4ೕ" 4ೕ" 4ೕ" 4ೕ" ಕಂಡುಬಂರುತ\ೆ ಕಂಡುಬಂರುತ\ೆ ಕಂಡುಬಂರುತ\ೆ ಕಂಡುಬಂರುತ\ೆ, PÀæ.¸À ªÀÄAdÆjzÁgÀgÀ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ UÁæªÀÄ ¸À.£ÀA ªÀÄAdÆg ÁzÀ «¹ÛÃtð ¸À.£ÀA 150gÀ ªÀÄÆ® «¹ÛÃtð UÉÆÃªÀiÁ ¼ÀzÀ°è ®¨sÀå«gÀÄ ªÀ «¹ÛÃtð µÀgÁ 01 ೇವ$ಾಜು kE ಮಂŒೇ-ೌಡ 0.25 02 ಾ*ವಮg 3ೋಂ =ದXಯ* 3.00 03 PÀȵÉÚÃ-ೌಡ kE ಸಗ9ೇ-ೌಡ 0.28 04 ಈರಯ* kE ಜವರಯ* a£ÉßãÀºÀ½î 150 2.02 24.37 4.14 F ªÀÄAdÆj ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£À Äß ºÀPÀÄÌzÁR® Ä PÀæªÀÄ dgÀÄV¸À¨ÉÃP ÁzÀgÉ MlÄÖ 6.15 JPÀgÉ d«ÄãÀÄ ¨ÉÃPÁVzÀÄÝ, CzÀgÉ Dgï.n.¹AiÀ ÄAvÉ 4.14 JPÀgÉ UÉÆÃªÀiÁ¼À «gÀÄvÀÛzÉ E£ÀÆß G½PÉ 2.01 JPÀgÉ ¨ÉÃPÁVgÀÄvÀÛ zÉ, F jÃw DUÀ®Ä PÁgÀt ¥Àæw 15 PÀqÀvÀPÉÌ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹ zÀAvÉ £ÀPÉë vÀAiÀiÁj¹gÀÄ ªÀÅzÀjAzÀ. MlÄÖ 6.15 JPÀgÉ 4.14 JPÀgÉ ಒಂದು ಒಂದು ಒಂದು ಒಂದು -ಾಮ3ೆ -ಾಮ3ೆ -ಾಮ3ೆ -ಾಮ3ೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ನnೆ ನnೆ ನnೆ ನnೆ ಮತು\ ಮತು\ ಮತು\ ಮತು\ ವರ ವರ ವರ ವರ ತ:ಾ4ಸುವ ತ:ಾ4ಸುವ ತ:ಾ4ಸುವ ತ:ಾ4ಸುವ 4ೕ" 4ೕ" 4ೕ" 4ೕ" ಈ ಈ ಈ ಈ 3ೆಳಕಂಡಂೆ 3ೆಳಕಂಡಂೆ 3ೆಳಕಂಡಂೆ 3ೆಳಕಂಡಂೆ ಇರುತ\ೆ ಇರುತ\ೆ ಇರುತ\ೆ ಇರುತ\ೆ xxxxxx ºÉêÀiÁªÀw d¯Áಶಯ ಮುಳ+ಗೆ ಸಂತಸ^4-ೆ 9ಾಂಕ: 04/03/1971 ರಂದು ;ೊರ<=ದ -ೆŒೆ• C¢ü¸ÀÆZÀ£Éಯ ೇಲೂರು ಾಲೂ ನ ಒಟುr 5 -ಾಮಗಳ ಧ ಸaೇ? ನಂಬಗಳ ಪೇಶವನುY – PÁ¬ÄÝj¹zÀÄÝ, ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 9ಾಂಕ: 26/09/1970 ರಂದು /ಾನ* F5ಾ 23ಾ4ಗಳ+ ºÉÆgÀr¹zÀ ಅ2ಸೂಚ9ೆಯ ೇಲೂರು ಾಲೂ ನ ಧ -ಾಮಗಳ ಜ!ೕನುಗಳನುY 3ಾ„X4ಸ5ಾ%ೆ ಈ ಎರಡು ಅ2ಸೂಚ9ೆಗಳ+ -ೊಂದಲ ಉಂ•ಾ%ದದುX, ಇದರ ಸ€‘rಕರಣ 3ೋ4 Šೇಷ ಭೂ Vಾs2ೕ9ಾ23ಾ4ಗಳ+, ;ೇ/ಾವ" ಜ5ಾಶಯ ‚ೕಜ9ೆ, ;ಾಸನ ರವ4-ೆ ಪತ ಬ$ೆಯ5ಾ%ರುತ\ೆ, ;ೇ/ಾವ" ಮತು\ ಯಗf ಜ5ಾಶಯ ‚ೕಜ9ೆಯ ಮುಳ+ಗೆ ಸಂತಸ^4-ೆ !ೕಸಟr ಪೇಶದ ;ಾಗೂ /ಾF Vೈ]ಕ4-ೆ !ೕಸ~r ಪೇಶದ ಈ ಂೇ ಬಗಹುಕುಂ ಸಕಮ ಸ!"ಯ ನಾವ[ ನೆದು ಹಲವ) ಪಕರಣಗಳ+ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ% Vಾಗುವ[ fೕ~ ಸಹ ತ4=ರುಾ\$ೆ, ಆದ$ೆ ಹಕುಾಖ5ಾ%ರುವ)ಲ , Uೕಲಂಡ ಎ5ಾ ನೂ*ನ*ೆಗಳ+ 3ೇವಲ 3ೆಲವ) ಕಡತಗ[ಂದ ಗುರು"ಸ5ಾ%ದುX, ;ಾ ಸ!"ಯ ಮುಂೆ -ಾಮaಾರು ಮಂಜೂ4 ಕಡತವನುY ಮಂ<= ಸಮಪ?aಾ%ದX$ೆ /ಾತ ಅನು`ೕದ9ೆ ಪೆದು ಹಕುಾಖ5ೆ ಕಮ ಜರು%ಸ5ಾಗುವ)ದು ;ಾಗೂ ನೂ*ನ*ೆಗಳ+ ಕಂಡುಬಂರುವ ಕಡತಗಳ ಬ-ೆ. ಮೊ\Ug ಪ4Zೕ= ವರ ಸ ಸ5ಾಗುವ)ದು. ತªÀÄä ನಂಬು-ೆಯ ¸À»/- vÀºÀ¹Ã¯ÁÝgï ೇಲೂರು ಾಲೂ ಕು” (Emphasis added) The Assistant Commissioner forwards the report along with his analysis to the Deputy Commissioner. The said communication dated 19-12-2020, reads as follows: 16 “£ÀA.J¯ïJ£ïr.(2)294/2019-20 ¢£ÁAPÀ:19/12/2020 ಉಪ1ಾ-ಾ23ಾ4, ಸಕ5ೇಶಪ)ರ ಉಪ1ಾಗ, ಸಕ5ೇಶಪ)ರ. /ಾನ*$ೇ, «µÀAiÀÄ: ¨ÉîÆgÀÄ vÁ®ÆèQ£À°è F »AzÉ £ÀqÉ¢gÀĪÀ §UÀgï ºÀÄPÀÄÌA ¸ÁUÀĪÀ½ ಸಕ!ೕಕರಣ ಸ!"ಯ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ%ರುವ ಪಕರಣಗಳ ಹಲವ) ನೂ*ನ*ೆಗಳ+ ಕಂಡುಬಂರುವ ಕು4ತು. ಉ5ೆ ೕಖ: ತಹZ5ಾX ೇಲೂರು ರವರ ಪತ ಸಂ.ಅ"ಕಮಣ.12/2020-21 ¢£ÁAPÀ:17/11/2020. ******* Uೕಲಂಡ ಷಯ3ೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದ ೇಲೂರು ಾಲೂ ಕು §UÀgï ºÀÄPÀÄÌA ¸ÁUÀĪÀ½ ಸಕ!ೕಕರಣ ಸ!"ಯ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ%ರುವ ;ಾಗೂ ಮಂಜೂರು /ಾಡಲು ಾ ಇರುವ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ºÀ®ªÁgÀÄ £ÀÆå£ÀåvÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ಕಂಡುಬಂರುವ)ಾ% ಉ5ೆ ೕಖದಂೆ ತಹZೕ5ಾX ೇಲೂರು ರವರು ವರ ಸ =ರುಾ\$ೆ. ಸದ4 ವರಯನುY ಪ4Zೕಸ5ಾ%, ಈ ಂೆ 2017-20189ೇ Vಾನ ಸು/ಾರು 859 ಪಕರಣಗಳ+ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ% ಹಕುಾಖಲು ಆಗೇ ಾ ಇದXಂತಹ ಕಡತಗಳನುY ಮೊ\Ug ಪ4=ೕ=ಾಗ ಕಡತದ ಹಲವ) ನೂ*ನ*ೆಗಳ+ ಕಂಡುಬಂದುX, ಅದರ ಮುಖ*aಾ% ಮಂಜೂ4-ೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಕ9ಾ?ಟಕ ಭೂ ಕಂಾಯ 3ಾjX ಕಲಂ 94(ಎ) ಮತು\ 94(k)ರಂೆ ಮತು\ ಸ3ಾ?ರವ) 3ಾಲ3ಾಲ3ೆ ;ೊರ<=ರುವ ಸುೊ\ೕ5ೆಯಂೆ ಕಮ ಜರು%ಸೇ3ಾ%ರುತ\ೆ. ಆದ$ೆ ಈ ಂೇ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ%ರುವ 859 ಪಕರಣಗ[-ೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಸ!"ಯು ನೆರುವ ಬ-ೆ. ಕಡತದ ನಮೂ=ದುX, ಬಗgïಹುಕುಂ ಸಕಮ ಸ!"ಯು ನೆರುವ ಬ-ೆ. ನಾವ[ ವಯ :ಾವ)ೇ ನಮೂದು ಇರುವ)ಲ . ಇಂತಹ ಪಕರಣಗಳನುY ಸ!"ಯ ಮುಂೆ ಮಂ<= ಹಕುಾಖಲು ಕಮಜರು%ಸುವ ಬ-ೆ. ಅನು`ೕದ9ೆ ಪೆದು ಹಕುಾಖ5ೆ ಕಮ ಜರು%ಸ5ಾ%ರುತ\ೆ. ೇಲೂರು ಾಲೂ ನ ರಚ9ೆ:ಾ%ರುವ ಬಗಹುಕುಂ ಸಕಮ ಸ!"ಯ ಮುಂೆ ಮಂ<ಸಲು 4571 ಅF?ಗಳ+ ಾ ಇರುವ)ಾ% ಪಗ" ವರಯನುY ಸ =ದುX, ಬಗ ಹುಕುಂ ಸಕಮ ಸ!"ಯ ಮುಂೆ ಮಂ<ಸಲು :ಾವ)ೇ ಮೂಲ ಅF?ಗಳ+ 3ಾ:ಾ?ಲಯದ aಾ*w\ಯ5ಾ ಗ, 17 ಕxೇ4ಯ =ಬyಂಗzಾದ ಉಪತಹ=ೕ5ಾX, $ಾಜಸs ]4ೕ{ಕರು ಮತು\ -ಾಮ5ೆ3ಾ23ಾ4ಗಳ ಬ[ ಇರುವ)ಲ , ;ಾಗೂ ಸದ4 ಅF?ಗಳ =^"ಗಳ ಬ-ೆ. ಪ4Zೕಸಲು ºÁ° ಷಯ ವ ಇರುವ)ಲ . ನಮೂ9ೆ-53ರ =sೕಕ*-ೊಂಡ ಅF?ಗಳ |ೈ ಾ ಅF?ಗ¼ÀÄ F 3ಾಯ?ಲಯದ aಾ*w\ಯ ಲಭ*ರುವ)ಲ . ಆದ$ೆ =sೕಕೃತ-ೊಂಡ ಅF?ಗಳನುY ವಯ°è £ÀªÀÄÆzÀÄ ªÀiÁrzÀÄÝ. ಸದ4 ವಯ ಆಾರದ Uೕ5ೆ ಸಕಮ 3ಾಯ? ಈ AzÉ 'ನೆಸ5ಾ%ರುತ\ೆ, ಆದ$ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ-53ರ ವಯ 3ೆಲ -ಾಮಗಳ ;ಾzೆ ಹ4ದು;ೋ%ದX ಇದ4ಂದ ಅF?ಗಳ ವರಗಳ+ ಾಖ5ಾ%ರುವ ಬ-ೆ. ಪ4Zೕಸಲು Vಾಧ*aಾಗು"\ರುವ)ಲ ;ಾಗೂ ಇನೂY 3ೆಲವ) -ಾಮಗ[-ೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಸದ4 -ಾಮ3ೆ ಮಂಜೂ4 3ೋ4 ಬಂದಂತಹ ಅF?ಗಳನುY ಅಂನ ತಹ=ೕ5ಾXರವರು ದೃ}ೕಕ4=ರುವ)ಲ . 3ೆಲವ) -ಾಮಗಳ ತಹ=ೕ5ಾXರವರು ದೃ}ೕಕ4=ದ ನಂತರವ) ಅF?ಗಳ+ ಬಂರುವ)ಾ% ನಮೂಾ%ರುತ\ೆ, ವಯ ಬ$ೆರುವವರ ಬರಹವ) ಸಹ ಒಂದ3ೊಂದು ಾzೆ ಇರುವ)ಲ , ಇದ4ಂದ ಅF?ಗಳನುY ಪ4ಗƒಸೇ3ಾಾಗ ತುಂಾ -ೊಂದಲ ಉಂ•ಾ%ರುತ\ೆ. ಸ3ಾ?ರದ ಸುೊ\ೕ5ೆಯಂೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ-53ರ =sೕಕೃತ-ೊಂ<ರುವ ಅF?ಗಳ+ ಲಭ*ಲ ೇ ಇದX ಪ{ದ ನಮೂ9ೆ-53ರ 4Fಸrನ ನಮೂಾ%ರುವ)ದರ ಆ•ಾರದ Uೕ5ೆ ಉಧೃತ ನಕಲು ಪ"„ಂದ ಕಡತದ ನಾವ[ ನೆಸುವಂೆ ]ೇ?ಶನರುತ\ೆ, ಮೂಲ ಅF?ಗಳ+ ಲಭ*ರುವ)ಲ ;ಾಗೂ ನಮೂ9ೆ-53ರ ವಯನುY ಸಮಪ?ಕaಾ% ]ವ?ಸೆ ಇರುವ)ದ4ಂದ ಾಖ5ಾ%ರುವ ಅF?ಗಳ /ಾ"ಯನುY ಕ$ಾರು ಒಕ-ಾ% ಗುರು"ಸಲು Vಾಧ*aಾಗು"\ರುವ)ಲ , 3ಾರಣ ವಯ ನ ;ಾzೆಗಳ+ ಹ4ದು;ೊ%ದುX ;ಾಗೂ ವಯ ಅF?ಗಳ+ ಬಂರುವ ಬ-ೆ. ದೃ}ೕಕ4ಸೇ ಇರುವ ಹಲವ) ಪಕರಣಗಳ+ 2017ರ /ಾಚ? ನಂತರ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ%ರುತ\ೆ ಎಂದು ವರ ಸ =ರುಾ\$ೆ. ನಮೂ9ೆ-53ರ =sೕಕೃತ-ೊಂ<ರುವ ಅF?ಗಳ ಪಗ" ಬ-ೆ. ಈ ಕxೇ4ಯ :ಾವ)ೇ ವ ಇ~rಲ ೇ ಇರುವ)ದ4ಂದ ಅF?ಗಳ =^" ಬ-ೆ. ]2?ಷraಾ% ಅF?ಗಳ 5ೇaಾ4 ಬ-ೆ. /ಾ" ]ೕಡಲು Vಾಧ*aಾಗು"\ರುವ)ಲ , ಈ ಂೇ 5ೇaಾ4 ಅF?ಗ[-ೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಸಂಪ•ಣ? ಕಡತಗಳ+ ಈ 3ಾಯ?ಲಯದ ಲಭ*ರುವ)ಲ , ಅನ2ಕೃತ Vಾಗುವ[ ಸಕಮ 3ೋ4 ನಮೂ9ೆ-53ರ ಅF? ಪ4Zೕಸಲು 9ಾಂಕ: 30/04/1999 ರಂದು ಕೆ 9ಾಂಕaಾ%ರುತ\ೆ, ಕ9ಾ?ಟಕ ಭೂ ಕಂಾಯ 3ಾjX ಕಲಂ 94(ಎ) ಮತು\ 94(k)ರಂೆ ಆ ವಷ?3ೆ ಅF?ಾರ4-ೆ 18 ವಷ? ವ‚ೕ!" ;ೊಂರೇಕು ;ಾಗೂ ಮಂಜೂ4-ೆ 3ೋ4ರುವ ಪೇಶದ ಮಂಜೂ4ಾರರು 19879ೇ Vಾ]ಂದಲೂ ಸತತaಾ% ಉಳ+U /ಾ<3ೊಂ<ರತಕದುX, ಈ ಂೇ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ%ರುವ ಪಕರಣಗಳ ಕಡತಗಳನುY ಪ4Zೕ=ಾಗ 19879ೇ Vಾನ ಅ|ಾಪ\ ವಯಸ4ಗೂ ಸಹ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ"-ೆ ಪ4ಗƒಸ5ಾ%ೆ, ಕ9ಾ?ಟಕ ಭೂ ಕಂಾಯ 3ಾjX ಕಲಂ 94(ಎ) ಮತು\ 94(k) ರನsಯ ಮತು\ ಸ3ಾ?ರವ) 3ಾಲ 3ಾಲ3ೆ ;ೊರ<=ರುವ ]ಯಮಗಳ ಅ<ಯ ಮಂಜೂ4 ಕಮ 3ೈ-ೊಳdೇ3ಾ%ರುತ\ೆ ಆದ$ೆ ಈ ಂೇ ಇಂತಹ ಪಕರಣಗಳನುY ಮಂಜೂರು /ಾ<ರುಾ\$ೆ. ಭೂ ಕಂಾಯ 3ಾjX 94 ರಂೆ ಮತು\ ಸ3ಾ?ರದ ಆೇಶ ಸಂAೆ*: ಆ<168 ಎJFw 2014, 17/03/2018ರ ಆೇಶದಂೆ ಪ)ರಸ1ೆ 18 aಾ*w\„ಂದ 3.!ೕ ಒಳ-ೆ ಬರುವ ಜ!ೕನುಗಳನುY ಮಂಜೂರು /ಾಡಲು ಅವ3ಾಶರುವ)ಲ , ಆದ$ೆ ಈ ಂೆ ಇಂತಹ ಪಕರಣಗಳನುY ಸಹ ಬಗgïಹುಕುಂ ಸಕಮ ಸ!"ಯ ಮಂಜೂರು /ಾ< Vಾಗುವ[ fೕ~ ಸಹ ]ೕ<ರುಾ\$ೆ. ಆದ$ೆ ಇಂತಹ ಪಕರಣಗಳ+ ಹಕುಾಖ5ಾ%ರುವ)ಲ . «±ÉõÀªÁV ಕಸ1ಾ ಕಸ1ಾ ಕಸ1ಾ ಕಸ1ಾ ;ೋಬ[ ;ೋಬ[ ;ೋಬ[ ;ೋಬ[ ಎ‹ ಎ‹ ಎ‹ ಎ‹.ಶಂಭುಗನಹ[d ಶಂಭುಗನಹ[d ಶಂಭುಗನಹ[d ಶಂಭುಗನಹ[d -ಾಮ3ೆ -ಾಮ3ೆ -ಾಮ3ೆ -ಾಮ3ೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ 9ಾಂಕ 9ಾಂಕ 9ಾಂಕ 9ಾಂಕ: 11- 02-1994 gÀ, ನಾವ[ಯಂೆ ನಾವ[ಯಂೆ ನಾವ[ಯಂೆ ನಾವ[ಯಂೆ ಒಟುr ಒಟುr ಒಟುr ಒಟುr 51 ಜನ4-ೆ ಜನ4-ೆ ಜನ4-ೆ ಜನ4-ೆ ಬಗ ಬಗ ಬಗ ಬಗ ಹುಕುಂ ಹುಕುಂ ಹುಕುಂ ಹುಕುಂ ಸಕಮ ಸಕಮ ಸಕಮ ಸಕಮ ಸ!"ಯ ಸ!"ಯ ಸ!"ಯ ಸ!"ಯ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ%ದುX ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ%ದುX ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ%ದುX ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ%ದುX, ಈ ಈ ಈ ಈ |ೈ |ೈ |ೈ |ೈ 31 ಜನ4-ೆ ಜನ4-ೆ ಜನ4-ೆ ಜನ4-ೆ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಂೇ ಂೇ ಂೇ ಂೇ 2017-20189ೇ 9ೇ 9ೇ 9ೇ Vಾನ Vಾನ Vಾನ Vಾನ Vಾಗುವ[ Vಾಗುವ[ Vಾಗುವ[ Vಾಗುವ[ fೕ~ fೕ~ fೕ~ fೕ~ ಸಹ ಸಹ ಸಹ ಸಹ ತರ=ರುಾ\ ತರ=ರುಾ\ ತರ=ರುಾ\ ತರ=ರುಾ\$ೆ$ೆ$ೆ$ೆ, ಆದ$ೆ ಆದ$ೆ ಆದ$ೆ ಆದ$ೆ ಸದ4ಯವ4-ೆ ಸದ4ಯವ4-ೆ ಸದ4ಯವ4-ೆ ಸದ4ಯವ4-ೆ ಹಕುಾಖ5ಾ%ರುವ)ಲ ಹಕುಾಖ5ಾ%ರುವ)ಲ ಹಕುಾಖ5ಾ%ರುವ)ಲ ಹಕುಾಖ5ಾ%ರುವ)ಲ . ಈ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಪಕರಣವನುY ಪಕರಣವನುY ಪಕರಣವನುY ಪಕರಣವನುY ಪ4Zೕ=ಾಗ ಪ4Zೕ=ಾಗ ಪ4Zೕ=ಾಗ ಪ4Zೕ=ಾಗ ಸದ4 ಸದ4 ಸದ4 ಸದ4 ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ"ಯನುY ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ"ಯನುY ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ"ಯನುY ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ"ಯನುY /ಾನ* /ಾನ* /ಾನ* /ಾನ* F5ಾ 23ಾ4ಗಳ+ F5ಾ 23ಾ4ಗಳ+ F5ಾ 23ಾ4ಗಳ+ F5ಾ 23ಾ4ಗಳ+ ಆೇಶ ಆೇಶ ಆೇಶ ಆೇಶ ಸಂAೆ* ಸಂAೆ* ಸಂAೆ* ಸಂAೆ*: ಆ ಆ ಆ ಆಎಎಎಎ53-57/98-99, 9ಾಂಕ 9ಾಂಕ 9ಾಂಕ 9ಾಂಕ: 30/06/2003 ರಂದು ರಂದು ರಂದು ರಂದು ವŒಾ-ೊ[= ವŒಾ-ೊ[= ವŒಾ-ೊ[= ವŒಾ-ೊ[=, ಆೇಶದ ಆೇಶದ ಆೇಶದ ಆೇಶದ ಸದ4 ಸದ4 ಸದ4 ಸದ4 -ಾಮ3ೆ -ಾಮ3ೆ -ಾಮ3ೆ -ಾಮ3ೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಅನುಭವ ಅನುಭವ ಅನುಭವ ಅನುಭವ ಆ•ಾರದ ಆ•ಾರದ ಆ•ಾರದ ಆ•ಾರದ Uೕ5ೆ Uೕ5ೆ Uೕ5ೆ Uೕ5ೆ ಪ)ನಹಃ ಪ)ನಹಃ ಪ)ನಹಃ ಪ)ನಹಃ ಬಗ ಬಗ ಬಗ ಬಗಹುಕುಂ ಹುಕುಂ ಹುಕುಂ ಹುಕುಂ ಸ“ ಸ“ ಸ“ ಸ“ರಮ ರಮ ರಮ ರಮ ಸ!"ಯ ಸ!"ಯ ಸ!"ಯ ಸ!"ಯ ಮುಂೆ ಮುಂೆ ಮುಂೆ ಮುಂೆ ಮಂ<= ಮಂ<= ಮಂ<= ಮಂ<= ಮಂಜೂ4 ಮಂಜೂ4 ಮಂಜೂ4 ಮಂಜೂ4 ಬ-ೆ. ಬ-ೆ. ಬ-ೆ. ಬ-ೆ. ಕಮ ಕಮ ಕಮ ಕಮ 3ೈ-ೊಳ+dವಂೆ 3ೈ-ೊಳ+dವಂೆ 3ೈ-ೊಳ+dವಂೆ 3ೈ-ೊಳ+dವಂೆ ]ೇ?Z= ]ೇ?Z= ]ೇ?Z= ]ೇ?Z= ಆೇZ=ದುX ಆೇZ=ದುX ಆೇZ=ದುX ಆೇZ=ದುX, ಆದ$ೆ ಆದ$ೆ ಆದ$ೆ ಆದ$ೆ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಂೆ ಂೆ ಂೆ ಂೆ ಆ%ರುವ ಆ%ರುವ ಆ%ರುವ ಆ%ರುವ ಸ!"ಯ ಸ!"ಯ ಸ!"ಯ ಸ!"ಯ ನಾವ[ಯಂೆ ನಾವ[ಯಂೆ ನಾವ[ಯಂೆ ನಾವ[ಯಂೆ Vಾಗುವ[ Vಾಗುವ[ Vಾಗುವ[ Vಾಗುವ[ fೕ~ fೕ~ fೕ~ fೕ~ ತ4=ರುಾ\$ೆ ತ4=ರುಾ\$ೆ ತ4=ರುಾ\$ೆ ತ4=ರುಾ\$ೆ. ಈ ಈ ಈ ಈ -ಾಮವ) -ಾಮವ) -ಾಮವ) -ಾಮವ) ಸಹ ಸಹ ಸಹ ಸಹ ಪ)ರಸ1ೆ ಪ)ರಸ1ೆ ಪ)ರಸ1ೆ ಪ)ರಸ1ೆ aಾ*w\„ಂದ aಾ*w\„ಂದ aಾ*w\„ಂದ aಾ*w\„ಂದ ಸು/ಾರು ಸು/ಾರು ಸು/ಾರು ಸು/ಾರು 2.!ೕ !ೕ !ೕ !ೕ ದೂರaಾಗುತ\ೆ ದೂರaಾಗುತ\ೆ ದೂರaಾಗುತ\ೆ ದೂರaಾಗುತ\ೆ. ಈ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಪಕರಣಗ[-ೆ ಪಕರಣಗ[-ೆ ಪಕರಣಗ[-ೆ ಪಕರಣಗ[-ೆ ಹಕುಾಖಲು ಹಕುಾಖಲು ಹಕುಾಖಲು ಹಕುಾಖಲು ನೆಸಲು ನೆಸಲು ನೆಸಲು ನೆಸಲು ಈ ಈ ಈ ಈ ತರಹ ತರಹ ತರಹ ತರಹ ನೂ*ನ*ೆಗಳ+ ನೂ*ನ*ೆಗಳ+ ನೂ*ನ*ೆಗಳ+ ನೂ*ನ*ೆಗಳ+ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಪಕರಣದ ಪಕರಣದ ಪಕರಣದ ಪಕರಣದ ಕಂಡುಬಂರುತ\ೆ ಕಂಡುಬಂರುತ\ೆ ಕಂಡುಬಂರುತ\ೆ ಕಂಡುಬಂರುತ\ೆ. ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ ನಮೂ9ೆ-53ರ ರ ರ ರ =sೕಕೃತ-ೊಂ<ರುವ =sೕಕೃತ-ೊಂ<ರುವ =sೕಕೃತ-ೊಂ<ರುವ =sೕಕೃತ-ೊಂ<ರುವ ಅF?ಗಳನುY ಅF?ಗಳನುY ಅF?ಗಳನುY ಅF?ಗಳನುY 5ೇaಾ4 5ೇaಾ4 5ೇaಾ4 5ೇaಾ4 /ಾಡುವ /ಾಡುವ /ಾಡುವ /ಾಡುವ ಸಂಬಂಧ ಸಂಬಂಧ ಸಂಬಂಧ ಸಂಬಂಧ ಎ5ಾ ಎ5ಾ ಎ5ಾ ಎ5ಾ ಅF?ಗಳನುY ಅF?ಗಳನುY ಅF?ಗಳನುY ಅF?ಗಳನುY ಪ4ಗƒ= ಪ4ಗƒ= ಪ4ಗƒ= ಪ4ಗƒ= ಭೂಕಂಾಯ ಭೂಕಂಾಯ ಭೂಕಂಾಯ ಭೂಕಂಾಯ 3ಾjX 3ಾjX 3ಾjX 3ಾjX 94(ಎಎಎಎ) ಮತು\ ಮತು\ ಮತು\ ಮತು\ 94(kkkk) ;ಾಗೂ ;ಾಗೂ ;ಾಗೂ ;ಾಗೂ ]ಯಮ ]ಯಮ ]ಯಮ ]ಯಮ 97ರ ನ ರ ನ ರ ನ ರ ನ ಅಂಶಗಳನುY ಅಂಶಗಳನುY ಅಂಶಗಳನುY ಅಂಶಗಳನುY ಗಣ9ೆ-ೆ ಗಣ9ೆ-ೆ ಗಣ9ೆ-ೆ ಗಣ9ೆ-ೆ ೆ-ೆದು3ೊಂಡು ೆ-ೆದು3ೊಂಡು ೆ-ೆದು3ೊಂಡು ೆ-ೆದು3ೊಂಡು ಕಡತದ ಕಡತದ ಕಡತದ ಕಡತದ ನಾವ[ ನಾವ[ ನಾವ[ ನಾವ[ ನೆಸೇ3ಾ%ದುX ನೆಸೇ3ಾ%ದುX ನೆಸೇ3ಾ%ದುX ನೆಸೇ3ಾ%ದುX, ಆದ$ೆ ಆದ$ೆ ಆದ$ೆ ಆದ$ೆ ಒಂದು ಒಂದು ಒಂದು ಒಂದು -ಾಮ3ೆ -ಾಮ3ೆ -ಾಮ3ೆ -ಾಮ3ೆ ಸಂಬಂ ಸಂಬಂ ಸಂಬಂ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ 2=ದಂೆ 2=ದಂೆ 2=ದಂೆ ಒಂೆ ಒಂೆ ಒಂೆ ಒಂೆ ಕಡತದ ಕಡತದ ಕಡತದ ಕಡತದ ನಾವ[ ನಾವ[ ನಾವ[ ನಾವ[ ನೆ= ನೆ= ನೆ= ನೆ= ಅF?ಗಳನುY ಅF?ಗಳನುY ಅF?ಗಳನುY ಅF?ಗಳನುY 5ೇaಾ4 5ೇaಾ4 5ೇaಾ4 5ೇaಾ4 /ಾಡೇ3ಾ%ದುX /ಾಡೇ3ಾ%ದುX /ಾಡೇ3ಾ%ದುX /ಾಡೇ3ಾ%ದುX, ಆದ$ೆ ಆದ$ೆ ಆದ$ೆ ಆದ$ೆ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಈ ಂೆ ಂೆ ಂೆ ಂೆ ಸ!"ಯು ಸ!"ಯು ಸ!"ಯು ಸ!"ಯು ಒಂದು ಒಂದು ಒಂದು ಒಂದು ಅF?-ೆ ಅF?-ೆ ಅF?-ೆ ಅF?-ೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಸಂಬಂ2=ದಂೆ ಕಡತ ಕಡತ ಕಡತ ಕಡತ ನಾವ[ ನಾವ[ ನಾವ[ ನಾವ[ ನೆ=ದುX ನೆ=ದುX ನೆ=ದುX ನೆ=ದುX, ಇದ4ಂದ ಇದ4ಂದ ಇದ4ಂದ ಇದ4ಂದ ಒಟುr ಒಟುr ಒಟುr ಒಟುr =\ೕಣ?3ೆ =\ೕಣ?3ೆ =\ೕಣ?3ೆ =\ೕಣ?3ೆ ಾzೆ ಾzೆ ಾzೆ ಾzೆ ಇಲ ದಂೆ ಇಲ ದಂೆ ಇಲ ದಂೆ ಇಲ ದಂೆ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ" ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ" ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ" ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ" ]ೕಡ5ಾ%ೆ ]ೕಡ5ಾ%ೆ ]ೕಡ5ಾ%ೆ ]ೕಡ5ಾ%ೆ ಎಂದು ಎಂದು ಎಂದು ಎಂದು ಉ5ೆ ೕಖದ ಉ5ೆ ೕಖದ ಉ5ೆ ೕಖದ ಉ5ೆ ೕಖದ ಪತದ ಪತದ ಪತದ ಪತದ ವರ ವರ ವರ ವರ ಸ =ರುಾ\$ೆ ಸ =ರುಾ\$ೆ ಸ =ರುಾ\$ೆ ಸ =ರುಾ\$ೆ. ªÉÄÃಲಂಡ ಲಂಡ ಲಂಡ ಲಂಡ ಅಂಶಗಳ ಅಂಶಗಳ ಅಂಶಗಳ ಅಂಶಗಳ ಬ-ೆ. ಬ-ೆ. ಬ-ೆ. ಬ-ೆ. ಪ4Zೕ= ಪ4Zೕ= ಪ4Zೕ= ಪ4Zೕ= ಭೂಮಂಜೂ$ಾ" ಭೂಮಂಜೂ$ಾ" ಭೂಮಂಜೂ$ಾ" ಭೂಮಂಜೂ$ಾ" ]ಯಮಗಳನsಯ ]ಯಮಗಳನsಯ ]ಯಮಗಳನsಯ ]ಯಮಗಳನsಯ ]ಯ/ಾನುVಾರ ]ಯ/ಾನುVಾರ ]ಯ/ಾನುVಾರ ]ಯ/ಾನುVಾರ ಮಂಜೂರು ಮಂಜೂರು ಮಂಜೂರು ಮಂಜೂರು /ಾ<ಲ ರುವ /ಾ<ಲ ರುವ /ಾ<ಲ ರುವ /ಾ<ಲ ರುವ ಪಕರಣಗಳನುY ಪಕರಣಗಳನುY ಪಕರಣಗಳನುY ಪಕರಣಗಳನುY ಗುರು"= ಗುರು"= ಗುರು"= ಗುರು"=, ಭೂಮಂಜೂ$ಾ" ಭೂಮಂಜೂ$ಾ" ಭೂಮಂಜೂ$ಾ" ಭೂಮಂಜೂ$ಾ" ]ಯಮಗಳನsಯ ]ಯಮಗಳನsಯ ]ಯಮಗಳನsಯ ]ಯಮಗಳನsಯ ಕಮ ಕಮ ಕಮ ಕಮ 3ೈ-ೊಳdಲು 3ೈ-ೊಳdಲು 3ೈ-ೊಳdಲು 3ೈ-ೊಳdಲು, ;ಾಗೂ ;ಾಗೂ ;ಾಗೂ ;ಾಗೂ F5ಾ 23ಾ4ಗಳ F5ಾ 23ಾ4ಗಳ F5ಾ 23ಾ4ಗಳ F5ಾ 23ಾ4ಗಳ ಆೇಶ ಆೇಶ ಆೇಶ ಆೇಶ ಸಂAೆ* ಸಂAೆ* ಸಂAೆ* ಸಂAೆ*: ಆ ಆ ಆ ಆಎಎಎಎ53-57/98-99, 9ಾಂಕ 9ಾಂಕ 9ಾಂಕ 9ಾಂಕ: 30/06/2003 ರಂದು ರಂದು ರಂದು ರಂದು ವŒಾ-ೊ[= ವŒಾ-ೊ[= ವŒಾ-ೊ[= ವŒಾ-ೊ[=, ಅನುಭವದ ಅನುಭವದ ಅನುಭವದ ಅನುಭವದ ಆ•ಾರದ ಆ•ಾರದ ಆ•ಾರದ ಆ•ಾರದ Uೕ5ೆ Uೕ5ೆ Uೕ5ೆ Uೕ5ೆ ಪ)ನಹಃ ಪ)ನಹಃ ಪ)ನಹಃ ಪ)ನಹಃ ಬಗ ಬಗ ಬಗ ಬಗgïಹುಕುಂ ಹುಕುಂ ಹುಕುಂ ಹುಕುಂ ಸಕಮ ಸಕಮ ಸಕಮ ಸಕಮ ಸ!"ಯ ಸ!"ಯ ಸ!"ಯ ಸ!"ಯ ಮುಂೆ ಮುಂೆ ಮುಂೆ ಮುಂೆ ಮಂ<= ಮಂ<= ಮಂ<= ಮಂ<= ಮಂಜೂ4 ಮಂಜೂ4 ಮಂಜೂ4 ಮಂಜೂ4 ಬ-ೆ. ಬ-ೆ. ಬ-ೆ. ಬ-ೆ. ಕಮ ಕಮ ಕಮ ಕಮ 3ೈ-ೊಳ+dವಂೆ 3ೈ-ೊಳ+dವಂೆ 3ೈ-ೊಳ+dವಂೆ 3ೈ-ೊಳ+dವಂೆ ಆೇZ=ದXರೂ ಆೇZ=ದXರೂ ಆೇZ=ದXರೂ ಆೇZ=ದXರೂ ಸಕಮ ಸಕಮ ಸಕಮ ಸಕಮ ಸ!" ಸ!" ಸ!" ಸ!" - ಮುಂೆ ಮುಂೆ ಮುಂೆ ಮುಂೆ ಮಂ<ಸೇ ಮಂ<ಸೇ ಮಂ<ಸೇ ಮಂ<ಸೇ Vಾಗುವ[ Vಾಗುವ[ Vಾಗುವ[ Vಾಗುವ[ fೕ~ fೕ~ fೕ~ fೕ~ ]ೕಡಲು ]ೕಡಲು ]ೕಡಲು ]ೕಡಲು 3ಾರಣ$ಾದ 3ಾರಣ$ಾದ 3ಾರಣ$ಾದ 3ಾರಣ$ಾದ ;ಾಗೂ ;ಾಗೂ ;ಾಗೂ ;ಾಗೂ Uೕಲಂಡ Uೕಲಂಡ Uೕಲಂಡ Uೕಲಂಡ ಎ5ಾ ಎ5ಾ ಎ5ಾ ಎ5ಾ ನೂ*ನ*ೆಗ[-ೆ ನೂ*ನ*ೆಗ[-ೆ ನೂ*ನ*ೆಗ[-ೆ ನೂ*ನ*ೆಗ[-ೆ 3ಾರಣ$ಾ%ರುವ 3ಾರಣ$ಾ%ರುವ 3ಾರಣ$ಾ%ರುವ 3ಾರಣ$ಾ%ರುವ ಅ23ಾ4 ಅ23ಾ4 ಅ23ಾ4 ಅ23ಾ4/ 9ೌಕರರ 9ೌಕರರ 9ೌಕರರ 9ೌಕರರ ರುದl ರುದl ರುದl ರುದl ]ಯ/ಾನುVಾರ ]ಯ/ಾನುVಾರ ]ಯ/ಾನುVಾರ ]ಯ/ಾನುVಾರ ಸೂಕ\ ಸೂಕ\ ಸೂಕ\ ಸೂಕ\ ಕಮ ಕಮ ಕಮ ಕಮ 3ೈ-ೊಂಡು 3ೈ-ೊಂಡು 3ೈ-ೊಂಡು 3ೈ-ೊಂಡು ವರ ವರ ವರ ವರ ಸ ಸಲು ಸ ಸಲು ಸ ಸಲು ಸ ಸಲು ಉ5ೆ ೕಖದ ಉ5ೆ ೕಖದ ಉ5ೆ ೕಖದ ಉ5ೆ ೕಖದ ವರಯನುY ವರಯನುY ವರಯನುY ವರಯನುY ಇದ$ೊಂ-ೆ ಇದ$ೊಂ-ೆ ಇದ$ೊಂ-ೆ ಇದ$ೊಂ-ೆ ಲಗ"\= ಲಗ"\= ಲಗ"\= ಲಗ"\= ಕಳ+=ೆ ಕಳ+=ೆ ಕಳ+=ೆ ಕಳ+=ೆ. ತಮg Šಾs=, ¸À»/- 19 C¥Àರ F5ಾ 23ಾ4, ;ಾಸನ F5ೆ , ;ಾಸನ. (Emphasis added) The analysis is that original form 53 application is not there in 99% of the files presented to the Samithi during the period from 2016 to 2022. The file processing is based on hand written ledger extract copy prepared by the Village Accountants and the Sheristedars. The Tahsildar’s spot inspection is indicative of the fact that the lands granted are not even present in the files, no inspection took place and in some cases records are destroyed to evade proof and lands were granted on fake family genealogical certificates notarized and have been granted to fake beneficiaries. A chart is also indicated as illustration. Several of the files were not even put up before the Samithi. Decision was taken by the Chairman and in some grants made to the persons were on the score that they were holding unauthorized lands did not even belong to Belur Taluk. Based upon this, further proceedings are on. The detailed report of the Assistant Commissioner dated 14.10.2022, addressed to the Deputy Commissioner, Hassan District, obtained by respondent No.2 under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, reads as follows: “No.L.N.438/2021-22 Date:14/10/2022 To, The Deputy Commissioner, Hassan District, Karnataka Subject: Inquiry of land grants done during 2016 to 2022 in Belur Taluk-reg. Reference: 1. Letter No.LND (2)294/2019-20 dated: 19/12/2020 from the office of Deputy Commissioner, Hassan District. 2. Letter No. Athikramana: 12/202-21 dated 17/11/2020 from office of Tahsildar, Belur Taluk, Hassan District. 20 Respected Madam, 1. With reference to the subject cited above, the undersigned would like to bring to the notice of your kind authority the information regarding the Letter No. Athikramana: 12/2020-21 dated: 17/11/2020 from office of Tahsildar, Belur Taluk, Hassan District. (shown below) 2. In response to the Letter No. Athikramana: 12/2020-21 dated: 17/11/2020 from office of Tahsildar, Belur Taluk, Hassan District, the undersigned has received a letter vide Letter No. LND(2)294/2019-20 dated: 19/12/2020 from the office of Deputy Commissioner, Hassan District. (shown below) In your letter vide Letter No. LND (2)294/2019-20 dated: 19/12/2020 from the office of Deputy Commissioner, Hassan District, directions have been issued to the undersigned to identify the land the land grants of Belur Taluk which are made in violations of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1966 Karnataka Land Grant Rules, 1969 and circulars of Government of Karnataka regarding land grant rules. Also the directions have been issued by your kind office to identify the officials involved in such unscrupulous land grants and send the report to your kind office. 3. As per the directions by your kind authority, the undersigned has inspected the 1430 land grants files of Belur Taluk pertaining to the years 2016 to 2022 The details of the land grants with the remarks of the undersigned are enclosed (Annexure-1). 4. The findings of the inspections are as mentioned below: a. A total of 2750.86 Acres of Government land has been granted (Saguvali Chit given) by the 05 Tahsildars namely, Puttashetty B.S, Parmesh H.S, B.A. Jagadeesh, J Umesh and U.M. Mohan Kumar who had worked in Belur Taluk, Hassan District during 2016 to 2022. Out of the 2750.86 Acres Government land (Presumptive value ` 6,87,71,48,750.00 i.e. ` Six Hundred and Eighty Seven Crores, Seventy One Lakhs Forty Eight Thousands 21 and Seven Fifty) granted, Khatha entries have been made for 2560.80 Acres (Presumptive value ` 6,40,20,05,000.00 i.e. ` Six Hundred and Forty Crores, Twenty Lakhs and Five Thousands). The details are enclosed (Annexure-2). b. The 1430 inspected land grant files are categorized broadly into 03 colour codes which are Red, Yellow and Blue. The red category grant files are having major lapses in the grant procedure and also include illegal grants. The yellow category grants are having comparatively lesser lapses in the grant procedure but still require a detailed verification of grant. The blue category grant files are the files in which the grant procedure has either been completed fully or partially but the Saguvali chits are yet to be issued. Grant Category Number of Grants Sum of Presumptive value of Government Land (25 lakh per acre inclusive of Maramalki) Sum of Total Acres Blue 46 `17,88,46,875.00 71.54 Red 1261 `6,26,58,36,250,00 2506.33 Yellow 123 `61,13,12,500.00 244.53 Grand Total 1430 7055995625 2822.40 c. Out of 1430 grants files inspected, 1384 saguvali chits have been issued and 1260 Khatas have been done for Government land by various Tahsildars as shown below. (Annexure-3) Tahsildar Tahsildar Doing Khata 22 giving Saguvali Chit B.A Jagdee sh H.S Parmesh J.Umes h N.V Natesh Puttashet ty B.S U.M.Mohan Kumar Saguva li Chit Given, Khata to be done Grand Total B.A Jagdeesh 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 H.S Parmesh 0 498 10 39 0 64 42 635 J.Umesh 0 0 147 23 0 28 66 264 Puttashetty B.S 0 42 10 9 279 35 15 390 U.M.Mohan Kumar 0 0 0 0 0 74 0 74 Grand Total 2 540 167 71 279 201 12 4 1384 d. The total acres of Government land granted by each Tahsidars along with The presumptive value of the Government land so granted are enclosed (Annexure-4) e. For the Total acres of the Government land granted, Khata dorie by each ahsidars along with the presumptive value of the Government land granted are enclosed. (Annexure-5) 23 f. Total acres of Government land granted and its presumptive value Hobli wise and color code wise, granted by each Tahsildar is enclosed. (Annexures-6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11) g. Total acres of Government land granted and Khata done, Hobli wise by each Tahsildar is enclosed (Annexures-12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19) 5. Analysis: 5. a. Original Form 53 application is not there in 99% of the files presented in Bagar Hukum Committee during the period from 2016 to 2022 in Belur taluk. File processing is based on handwritten ledger extract copy prepared by village accountants and Office Shirestedars themselves. b. Previous Committee proceedings are not verified regarding rejection of earlier applications. The original applications are not reviewed and file proceedings have started after about 15 to 18 years of receipt of the applications. In many of the cases the applications already rejected by the previous committee are again taken up and approved. c. Tahsildars spot inspection report for the land granted is not present in the files. Such spot inspections are ought to be done personally by the Tahsildars themselves or through their jurisdictional Deputy Tahsildars. In most of the files, Village Accountants have prepared sketches without any cross verification or approval by the concerned ADLR. This has led to the problem of grant of already previously granted land for which Phodi was not done, overlapping of sketches for the land grants proposed for more than one grantees and granting of land to ineligible persons. 24 Sum of Presumptive value of Government Land Granted (Rs. 25 lakh per acre inclusive Maramalki) d. In some cases Original 56 register entries are destroyed to evade the proof whether the applications have been rejected previously. Based on the Fake/ Notarized Family Genealogical Tree certificates lands have been granted to fake beneficiaries. Also previously rejected land grant applications are reconsidered after the applicant has portioned his property and transferred it to name of his relatives via registered partition deeds to show himself as eligible. Sum of Presumptive value of Government Land Khata done after Grant (Rs. 25 lakh per acre inclusive of Maramalki) 25 e. Two Tahsildars Puttashetty B.S and Parmesh H.S have made 390 (i.e., total 893.57 Acres and Presumptive value of Government land ````2,23,39,25,000.00) and 653 (i.e., total 1245.03 Acres and Presumptive value of Government land ` ` ` ` 3,11,25,67,500.00) Government land grants respectively which comes out to be 75.36% (i.e. 1043 land grants) out of the total 1384 Saguvali chits issued from the Taluk Office Belur during 2016 to 2018. Many of these saguvali chits are issued with major lapses in the procedure or even without putting the applications in front of the Bagar Hukum Committee. Out of 390 government land grants made by Tahsildar Puttashetty B.S, 15 files are still pending for the Khata. Similarly out of 653 government land grants made by Tahsildar Parmesh H.S, 42 files are pending for the Khata. f. In more than 99% of files there has been no consideration made with regard to the cattle population and sufficiency of the land reserved for cattle (Gomala) in the village, while making the land grants. g. Land reserved for the Ex-service men, Hemavathi Reservoir Project and Yagachi Reservoir Project is also disposed illegally through Akrama Sakrama land grants. h. After the first of the Unauthorised Cultivation Regularization Committee the form 54 is not published as per law in the Grama Chavadi for taking public objections to the grant proposals put for the 26 consideration. The signatures made on the Form-54 are suspected to be fake as neither the name nor the father's name has been mentioned of the villagers who have signed on the form -54. In some cases even if the objections are placed against making the land grants in favour of persons who already have excess land holding, such objections are not duly considered by the Tahsildars while putting up the files for second meeting of the grants Unauthorised Cultivation Regularization Committee. i. In some of the grants the person in whose favour the land has been granted does not belong to the Belur Taluk. Land has been granted to people whose residence is in Bangalore and other Districts except Hassan. j. The file numbers have not been properly given for many of the grant files. The file numbers are changing in the revenue inspector report, Belur Taluk case worker report and the saguvali chit issue register for the same grant. In some of the files the grant processing has been initiated and done without even giving any file number to the file. k. The Mara Malki has not been deducted to the Government treasury most of the land grants files inspected causing loss of revenue to the Government of Karnataka. 6. The details of all the files inspected along with the remarks are enclosed along with this letter. All the files for the 1430 land grants inspected by this office have been sealed off in three trunks in 29 bundles and handed over to the Record Room of Taluk Office Belur. One set of the record of the land grants files inspected is shared in the soft copy with the Taluk Office Belur for their office perusal. All the files have been duly scanned and the records have been burnt into 5 sets of 11 DVDs for the purpose of further perusal and investigation. (One such set is enclosed herewith). One set of the records of the 1430 land grants inspected is shared and placed in two systems in the soft copy with the Taluk Office Belur for their office perusal. 7. This is submitted for your kind consideration and necessary action please. Yours sincerely, 27 Sd/- (Prateek Bayal IAS) Assistant Commissioner, Sakleshpura Sub-Division, Hassan District, Karnataka. (Emphasis added) The 2nd respondent/complainant then seeks to register a complaint before the jurisdictional Police on 24.01.2023. The complaint reads as follows: ““UÉ, ¢£ÁAPÀ:24/01/2023 •ೕೕ‹ ಅೕ{ಕರು ;ಾಸನ F5ೆ ;ಾಸನ – 571 231 ಇಂದ, 3ೆ.=.$ಾಜಣ—, Vಾ/ಾFಕ 3ಾಯ?ಕತ? 39ೇ ಮುಖ* ರVೆ\, -ಾಂನಗರ PÉÆÃ¯ÁgÀ - 563101 ªÉÆ.7259880948 ಷಯ: :23/01/2023 ರಂದು ಸಂ˜ೆಯ ಅಪ$ಾದ3ೆ ಸಂಬಂ=ದ ದೂರನುY 9ೋಂದƒ /ಾಡೆ 3ೇವಲ =sೕಕೃ" ]ೕ< Lalith Kumari V/S Government of Uttar Pradesh and Other. ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è /ಾನ* ಸ™ೕ?ಚš 9ಾ*:ಾಲಯ ]ೕ<ರುವ "ೕw?ನ /ಾಗ?ಸೂfಗಳನುY ಉಲ ಂ›=, 9ಾ*:ಾಂಗ ]ಂದ9ೆ /ಾ<ರುವ ೇಲೂರು •ೕೕ‹ ]4ೕ{ಕರ Uೕ5ೆ ಐ.w.= ಕಲಂ 166(ಎ) ಪ3ಾರ ಎ•.ಐ.ಆ ಾಖಸಲು 3ೋ4 ದೂರು. 28 ಉ5ೆ ೕಖ: 1. 1ಾರತ ಸ3ಾ?ರದ ಆೇಶ ಸಂAೆ* 15011/91 :11/10/2014 ರ ಗೃಹ ಸfaಾಲಯದ ಸುೊ\ೕ5ೆ. 2. /ಾನ* ಕ9ಾ?ಟಕ ಉಪ 5ೋ3ಾಯುಕ\ k.ಎ‹.|ಾ~ೕJ, Zೕ ;ೆž.ಎಂ.3ಾಂತ$ಾಜು •ೕೕ‹ ]4ೕ{ಕರು, ಮ;ಾಲŸ 5ೇಔ• •ೕೕ‹ ¢ಾoೆ, ೆಂಗಳ£ರು ಉಪ5ೋ“/k.=.=-1095/JDgïJ¯ïN – 01 ¢£ÁAPÀ:11/10/2021 gÀAzÀÄ N¼ÁqÀ½vÀ ಇ5ಾAೆ-ೆ /ಾ<ರುವ Z|ಾರಸು‡. 3. :23/01/2023 ರಂದು ಸದ4 ದೂ49ೊಂ-ೆ ತಮg 271 ಪ)ಟಗಳ ]ೕ<ರುವ ದೂರು. Uೕಲಂಡ ಷಯ3ೆ ಸಂಬಂ=ದಂೆ, :23/01/2023 ರಂದು ೇಲೂರು •ೕೕ‹ ¢ಾoೆಯ •ೕೕ‹ ]4ೕ{ಕ, ೇಲೂರು ಇ -ೆ ಖುದುX ೇ~ ]ೕ<, ]ೕ<ರುವ ದೂ4ನ Vಾ$ಾಂಶ ೕ%ೆ. “2016 4ಂದ 2022 9ೇ Vಾನವ$ೆ-ೆ ೇಲೂರು ಾಲೂ ಕು, ಕಂಾಯ ಇ5ಾAೆ, ಕ9ಾ?ಟಕ ಸ3ಾ?ರಂದ ]ೕ!ಸಲ€ಟr ಭೂ ಸ!ೕಕರಣ ಸ!"ಯ ಅಧ*{ರು (;ಾ Šಾಸಕ) ಅ23ಾ$ೇತರ ಸದಸ*ರು, ಸದಸ* 3ಾಯ?ದZ?ಗzಾದ ತಹ=ೕ5ಾXಗಳ+ ಒಟುr 26 ಸ1ೆಗಳನುY ನೆ=, 2750.86 Vಾರ ಎಕ$ೆ/ಗುಂ•ೆ ಸ3ಾ?4 ಜ!ೕನನುY ಬ5ಾಡ*. ಅನಹ?, ಅ|ಾಪ\, ೆಂಗಳ£ರು ;ಾಗೂ ಇತ$ೆ ಾಲೂ ನ ]aಾ=ಗ[-ೆ ನಕ ಾಖ5ೆಗಳನುY ಸೃ‘r=, ವಂಚ9ೆ /ಾಡುವ ಉೆXೕಶಂದ, ಅಪ$ಾಕ ಒಳಸಂಚು ನೆ=, ಸುಳ+d ದVಾ\aೇಜುಗಳನುY ಬಳ=3ೊಂಡು. ಸಂ˜ೆಯ ಅಪ$ಾದaೆಸ%ರುಾ\$ೆ, ಈ ಬೃಹ¤ ಅಕಮವನುY ತ]Aೆ ನೆ=ರುವ, ಂನ ಸಕ5ೇಶಪ)ರ ಉಪ 1ಾ-ಾ23ಾ4 Zೕ ಪ"ೕ“ ಾಯJ ಐ.ಎ.ಎ‹ ರವರು ತಮg ತ]Aಾ ವರಯ ಈ Uೕಲಂಡ ಅಕಮ ಭೂ ಮಂಜೂ$ಾ" /ಾ<ರುವ ಸ3ಾ?ರದ ಊ;ಾತgಕ ೆ5ೆ 775,99,95,625/- 3ೋ~ ರೂ `ತ\aಾ%ೆjಂದು ಅಂಾF=ರುಾ\$ೆ. ಇದು ಅಪ$ಾದ ಪ41ಾ¦ೆಯ ಸಂ˜ೆಯ ಅಪ$ಾದaಾ%ರುತ\ೆ". DzÀÝjAzÀ, L.¦.¹. PÀ®A 468, 464, 465, 420, 471, 1206, 409 ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀt ಾಖಸಲು ದೂರು ]ೕ<ದ$ೆ, ¢ಾoಾ23ಾ4:ಾ%ರುವ ಸ;ಾಯಕ •ೕೕ‹ ಉಪ ]4ೕ{ಕರು ೇಲೂರು •ೕೕ‹ ¢ಾoೆಯ •ೕೕ‹ ]4ೕ{ಕರ ಅನುಮ" ಪೆದು =sೕಕೃ" ]ೕ<ರುಾ\$ೆ. ಾನು ಸಹ 3 ಾ4 `ೈJ ಮೂಲಕ 9480804782 •ೕೕ‹ ]4ೕ{ಕರ ಸಂAೆ*-ೆ ಸಂಪ?=, ಪಕರಣ 9ೋಂದƒ /ಾಡಲು ಪ4ಪ4:ಾ% kನYಹ /ಾ<3ೊಂಡರೂ ಎ§.ಐ.ಆ ಾಖಸಲು ]$ಾಕ4=ರುಾ\$ೆ. 29 /ಾನ* ಸ™ೕ?ಚš 9ಾ*:ಾಲಯದ "ೕw?ನ /ಾಗ?ಸೂfಗಳ ಪ3ಾರ ಈ Uೕಲಂಡ L.¦.¹ ಕಲಂ ಗಳ+ 3ಾನೂನು ಪ41ಾ¦ೆಯ ಸಂ˜ೆಯ ZŸಸಲ€ಡುವ ಅಪ$ಾದaಾ%ರುವ)ದ4ಂದ, ಪಕರಣ ಾಖಸೆ, /ಾನ* ಸ™ೕ?ಚš 9ಾ*:ಾಲಯದ /ಾಗ?ಸೂfಗಳನುY ಉಲ ಂ›= 9ಾ*:ಾಂಗ ]ಂದ9ೆ /ಾ<ರುವ ೇಲೂರು •ೕೕ‹ ]ೕ4ೕ{ಕರ Uೕ5ೆ ಐ.w.= ಕಲಂ 166(ಎ) ಪ3ಾರ ತ{ಣ ಎ•.ಐ.ಆ ಾಖಸಲು 3ೋರುೆ\ೕ9ೆ. ಸ/- (3ೆ.=.$ಾಜtÚ) ಪ"ಯನುY:- /ಾನ* F5ಾ 23ಾ4ಗಳ+ ;ಾಗೂ ಅಧ*{ರು, F5ಾ •ೕೕ‹ ದೂರು |ಾ3ಾರ, ;ಾಸನ F5ೆ , ;ಾಸನ, ಇವರ ರುದl ¨ಾರoೆ ನೆ= ಸೂಕ\ Zಸು\ ಕಮ3ೆ Z|ಾರಸು‡ /ಾಡಲು 3ಾನೂನು ಕಮ ಜರು%ಸಲು 3ೋರುೆ\ೕ9ೆ. ಸ/- (3ೆ.=.$ಾಜtÚ) ಸೂಕ\ಕಮ3ಾ%:- •ೕೕ‹ ]4ೕ{ಕರು, ೇಲೂರು •ೕೕ‹ ¢ಾoೆ, ೇಲೂರು ರವರ ಸೂಕ\ ಕಮ3ಾ% ಮರು ]aೇ=ೆ. ಸ/- (3ೆ.=.$ಾಜtÚ)” This was not acted upon. Further, a complaint was also made to the Superintendent of Police. Therefore, Section 154(1) and 154(3) of the Cr.P.C. stood complied. Even then, no action was taken. It is then a complaint comes to be registered before the learned Magistrate. The complaint did contain excerpts of the report quoted hereinabove. Therefore, quoting the complaint would become unnecessary. The concerned Court, on the complaint, takes cognizance of the offence by a detailed order. The order reads as follows: “11. Point No.1: The complainant is alleging that the accused persons have committed the offences punishable under section 468, 464, 465, 471, 409, 420 and 120(b) of IPC as averred in the complaint, which is narrated above. On perusal of the complaint averments and also the documents produced along with the complaint, it goes to show that the complainant has complied with the directions 30 given by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Priyanka Srivastava's Case. The complainant has lodged a complaint before the Jurisdictional Police Station, but no action was taken. The complainant has also lodged a compliant in this regard to the Higher Authorities also, but no action is taken in respect of the complaint lodged by the complainant. The complainant has also filed his affidavit stating that the averments made in the complaint are true and correct. As such, the complainant has filed this Private Complaint with the prayer of refer the complaint under 156(3) of Cr.P.C for investigation. 12. The complainant has produced documents in compliance of section 154 of Cr.P.C and also filed Affidavit in that regard. The complainant has sought to refer this case to the Jurisdictional Police for investigation. As such, at this pre-cognizance stage, bar under section 197 Cr.P.C., will not come into play And, this court is guided by the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka, in Crl.P.No.5659/2021 between Abharam T.J., Vs. B.S. Yediyurappa, Dated: 07.09.2022. I feel this is a fit case to refer the complaint for investigation under section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. As such, Point No.01 is answered in the AFFIRMATIVE. 13. Point No.2: The counsel for the complainant has also pressed to pass necessary orders on the Second Prayer made in the complaint. The complainant has prayed to initiate action against the Police Inspector, Belur Police Station, Belur Taluk, Hassan District. He has also referred to the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court, i.e., Lalita Kumari Vs Government of U.P and Ors. I have gone through the said decision. This court is constituted as a Special Court to deal with the cases filed against the MPs/MLAs in the State of Karnataka. The Second Prayer sought in the complaint is an independent case in which any MPs/MLAs are not involved. The said prayer is sought to initiate action against the Police Officer who did not register the case based on the complaint lodged by the complainant before the Police Station. As such, this court will not get the jurisdiction to initiate any action against the said Police Officer in this case, as the same will be an independent case. If the complainant is aggrieved by the action of the said Police Officer and he may proceed against him separately before the Jurisdictional Court. Accordingly, I answer this Point No.2 in the NEGATIVE. 31 14. Point No.3: For the reasons stated above, I proceed to pass the following: ORDER This complaint is referred to SHO of Belur Police Station, Belur Taluk, Hassan District, under section 156(3) of Cr.P.C for investigation.” Taking of cognizance and issuance of summons has driven the petitioners to this Court in the subject petition. 10. If what is noticed/quoted hereinabove is considered, what would unmistakably emerge is, that persons who were not even from Belur Taluk and who had produced fake and bogus certificates, the Samithi has granted the lands or regularized those lands as the case would be. The report of the Tahsildar forwarded to the Assistant Commissioner and the detailed report of the Assistant Commissioner to the Deputy Commissioner all of which would unmistakably, albeit prima facie, lead to a conclusion that Government lands are illegally bartered away, as if they are the personal properties of members of the Samithi and the office is treated as their personal fiefdom. It is not one, 10 or 100 acres; the lands that are bartered away are 2750 acres which then valued at ````750/- crores. If the petition is entertained and proceedings are closed against the petitioners, it would be putting a premium on the illegality committed by the Chairman and Members of the Samithi and accepting bartering away of Government lands as if they are self-acquired private properties of the Chairman and members of the Samithi. This is sans countenance, by any canon of law. This matter would require investigation in the least, as it involves maze of facts. The issue regarding sanction of public servants need not be gone into, as no public servant is before the Court. 11. It becomes apposite to refer to the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of KAPTAN SINGH v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH1, wherein, it has been held as follows: “9.1. At the outset, it is required to be noted that in the present case the High Court in exercise of powers under Section 482 CrPC has quashed the criminal proceedings for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 406, 329 and 386 1 (2021) 9 SCC 35 32 IPC. It is required to be noted that when the High Court in exercise of powers under Section 482 CrPC quashed the criminal proceedings, by the time the investigating officer after recording the statement of the witnesses, statement of the complainant and collecting the evidence from the incident place and after taking statement of the independent witnesses and even statement of the accused persons, has filed the charge-sheet before the learned Magistrate for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 406, 329 and 386 IPC and even the learned Magistrate also took the cognizance. From the impugned judgment and order [Radhey Shyam Gupta v. State of U.P., 2020 SCC OnLine All 914] passed by the High Court, it does not appear that the High Court took into consideration the material collected during the investigation/inquiry and even the statements recorded. If the petition under Section 482 CrPC was at the stage of FIR in that case the allegations in the FIR/complaint only are required to be considered and whether a cognizable offence is disclosed or not is required to be considered. However, thereafter when the statements are recorded, evidence is collected and the charge- sheet is filed after conclusion of the investigation/inquiry the matter stands on different footing and the Court is required to consider the material/evidence collected during the investigation. Even at this stage also, as observed and held by this Court in a catena of decisions, the High Court is not required to go into the merits of the allegations and/or enter into the merits of the case as if the High Court is exercising the appellate jurisdiction and/or conducting the trial. As held by this Court in Dineshbhai Chandubhai Patel [Dineshbhai Chandubhai Patel v. State of Gujarat, (2018) 3 SCC 104 : (2018) 1 SCC (Cri) 683] in order to examine as to whether factual contents of FIR disclose any cognizable offence or not, the High Court cannot act like the investigating agency nor can exercise the powers like an appellate court. It is further observed and held that that question is required to be examined keeping in view, the contents of FIR and prima facie material, if any, requiring no proof. At such stage, the High Court cannot appreciate evidence nor can it draw its own inferences from contents of FIR and material relied on. It is further observed it is more so, when the material relied on is disputed. It is further observed that in such a situation, it becomes the job of the investigating authority at such stage to probe and then of the court to examine questions once the charge-sheet is filed along with 33 such material as to how far and to what extent reliance can be placed on such material. 9.2. In Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar [Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar v. State of Maharashtra, (2019) 18 SCC 191 : (2020) 3 SCC (Cri) 672] after considering the decisions of this Court in Bhajan Lal [State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335 : 1992 SCC (Cri) 426] , it is held by this Court that exercise of powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash the proceedings is an exception and not a rule. It is further observed that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC though wide is to be exercised sparingly, carefully and with caution, only when such exercise is justified by tests specifically laid down in the section itself. It is further observed that appreciation of evidence is not permissible at the stage of quashing of proceedings in exercise of powers under Section 482 CrPC. Similar view has been expressed by this Court in Arvind Khanna [CBI v. Arvind Khanna, (2019) 10 SCC 686 : (2020) 1 SCC (Cri) 94] , Managipet [State of Telangana v. Managipet, (2019) 19 SCC 87 : (2020) 3 SCC (Cri) 702] and in XYZ [XYZ v. State of Gujarat, (2019) 10 SCC 337 : (2020) 1 SCC (Cri) 173] , referred to hereinabove. 9.3. Applying the law laid down by this Court in the aforesaid decisions to the facts of the case on hand, we are of the opinion that the High Court has exceeded its jurisdiction in quashing the criminal proceedings in exercise of powers under Section 482 CrPC. 10. The High Court has failed to appreciate and consider the fact that there are very serious triable issues/allegations which are required to be gone into and considered at the time of trial. The High Court has lost sight of crucial aspects which have emerged during the course of the investigation. The High Court has failed to appreciate and consider the fact that the document i.e. a joint notarised affidavit of Mamta Gupta Accused 2 and Munni Devi under which according to Accused 2 Ms Mamta Gupta, Rs 25 lakhs was paid and the possession was transferred to her itself is seriously disputed. It is required to be noted that in the registered agreement to sell dated 27-10-2010, the sale consideration is stated to be Rs 25 lakhs and with no reference to payment of Rs 25 lakhs to Ms Munni Devi and no reference to handing over the possession. However, in the joint notarised affidavit of the same date i.e. 27-10-2010 sale consideration is stated to be Rs 35 lakhs out of which Rs 25 34 lakhs is alleged to have been paid and there is a reference to transfer of possession to Accused 2. Whether Rs 25 lakhs has been paid or not the accused have to establish during the trial, because the accused are relying upon the said document and payment of Rs 25 lakhs as mentioned in the joint notarised affidavit dated 27-10-2010. It is also required to be considered that the first agreement to sell in which Rs 25 lakhs is stated to be sale consideration and there is reference to the payment of Rs 10 lakhs by cheques. It is a registered document. The aforesaid are all triable issues/allegations which are required to be considered at the time of trial. The High Court has failed to notice and/or consider the material collected during the investigation. 11. Now so far as the finding recorded by the High Court that no case is made out for the offence under Section 406 IPC is concerned, it is to be noted that the High Court itself has noted that the joint notarised affidavit dated 27-10- 2010 is seriously disputed, however as per the High Court the same is required to be considered in the civil proceedings. There the High Court has committed an error. Even the High Court has failed to notice that another FIR has been lodged against the accused for the offences under Sections 467, 468, 471 IPC with respect to the said alleged joint notarised affidavit. Even according to the accused the possession was handed over to them. However, when the payment of Rs 25 lakhs as mentioned in the joint notarised affidavit is seriously disputed and even one of the cheques out of 5 cheques each of Rs 2 lakhs was dishonoured and according to the accused they were handed over the possession (which is seriously disputed) it can be said to be entrustment of property. Therefore, at this stage to opine that no case is made out for the offence under Section 406 IPC is premature and the aforesaid aspect is to be considered during trial. It is also required to be noted that the first suit was filed by Munni Devi and thereafter subsequent suit came to be filed by the accused and that too for permanent injunction only. Nothing is on record that any suit for specific performance has been filed. Be that as it may, all the aforesaid aspects are required to be considered at the time of trial only. 12. Therefore, the High Court has grossly erred in quashing the criminal proceedings by entering into the merits of the allegations as if the High Court was exercising the appellate jurisdiction and/or conducting the trial. The High Court has exceeded its jurisdiction in 35 quashing the criminal proceedings in exercise of powers under Section 482 CrPC. 13. Even the High Court has erred in observing that original complaint has no locus. The aforesaid observation is made on the premise that the complainant has not placed on record the power of attorney along with the counter filed before the High Court. However, when it is specifically stated in the FIR that Munni Devi has executed the power of attorney and thereafter the investigating officer has conducted the investigation and has recorded the statement of the complainant, accused and the independent witnesses, thereafter whether the complainant is having the power of attorney or not is to be considered during trial. 14. In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, the impugned judgment and order [Radhey Shyam Gupta v. State of U.P., 2020 SCC OnLine All 914] passed by the High Court quashing the criminal proceedings in exercise of powers under Section 482 CrPC is unsustainable and the same deserves to be quashed and set aside and is accordingly quashed and set aside. Now, the trial is to be conducted and proceeded further in accordance with law and on its own merits. It is made clear that the observations made by this Court in the present proceedings are to be treated to be confined to the proceedings under Section 482 CrPC only and the trial court to decide the case in accordance with law and on its own merits and on the basis of the evidence to be laid and without being influenced by any of the observations made by us hereinabove. The present appeal is accordingly allowed.” (Emphasis supplied) In view of the preceding analysis, I hold that Bagair Hukum Committee has acted Bagair Kanoon, albeit, prima facie. 12. Finding no merit in the petition, the petition stands rejected.” This Court delineates as to how the petitioner and others were brought into the dragnet of crime. fter the disposal of the petition 36 on 13-09-2024, it appears examination of about 1200 files were necessary. The State submits that it has drawn up a format and in terms of the said format, the physical verification of the files is taking place. The format is as follows: 37 38 The action of the State cannot be found fault with as this Court had directed investigation into the entire episode on identification of 1200 beneficiaries/files all handled by Bagair Hukum Committee. 9. The issue now would be grant of bail. The petitioner is taken into custody about 40 days ago and remains in custody. The projection is that, the petitioner has undergone open heart surgery and his health would deteriorate if he is in the prison. That may not be the circumstance that would weigh for grant of bail. But, the issue is, the investigation is in progress and all the documents are admittedly seized and are in the custody of the CID. The custody of the petitioner would not be required for any further interrogation. 10. In the considered view of the Court as also the fact that several other accused, accused 2 to 6 are granted anticipatory bail, accused No.8 is granted anticipatory bail and accused Nos.3, 4, 5 and 9 are also granted bail, the petitioner also should get the same benefit. Who remain in the fray are few of the accused including the present petitioner, accused No.1. In the light of the aforesaid 39 facts, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the present petitioner on grant of bail imposing stringent conditions. 11. For the aforesaid reasons, the following: O R D E R (i) Criminal petition is allowed. (ii) Petitioner is granted bail on the following conditions: (a) The petitioner shall furnish a personal bond for a sum of ₹2,00,000/- (Rupees two lakhs only) with one solvent surety for the likesum to the satisfaction of the Trial Court; (b) The petitioner shall be regular in appearing before the Court on every date of hearing as also when called upon to do so by the Trial Court; (c) The petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or cause any threat to any of the prosecution witness(s) in any manner; (d) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called and submit all documents and details as may be called upon by the Investigating Officer; 40 (e) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Trial Court without prior permission; (f) In the event of violation of any of the above terms, this bail shall stand automatically cancelled. The observations made above are only for the purpose of consideration of the petition seeking bail and the same shall not, in any manner influence the trial. The Trial Court shall consider the case on its merits and without being influenced by this order. Registry is directed to communicate this order through electronic mail to the Jail Authorities, to enable them to release the petitioner from prison. I.A.No.1/2026 stands disposed, as a consequence. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ CT:BR