DHANRAJ REGAR S/O SHRI BALURAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/6085/2026 · 2026-04-29
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3317 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3317 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:18195] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6085/2026 Dhanraj Regar S/o Shri Baluram, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Ratakot, Vijaynagar, Police Station Bhinay, District Ajmer (Raj.) (Presently Confined At Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gaurav Rathore with Mr. Kartikay Johri For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 29/04/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.54/2026 registered at Police Station Krishnaganj, District Ajmer for offences under Sections 64(1), 115(2) and 351(2) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that both the accused and the prosecutrix are major. He refers to the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS, wherein she admitted that she has been in relationship with the petitioner for the past 4–5 years. It is further submitted that when the petitioner, due to certain circumstances, refused to marry with the prosecutrix, the present FIR was lodged on false
[2026:RJ-JP:18195] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6085/2026] and concocted grounds. Petitioner is behind the bars since
03.04.2026. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Dhanraj Regar S/o Shri Baluram, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/65