Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33168 (CHH)

KU. BABITA PRADHAN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/471/2020 · 2026-08-23

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010017472020 2026:CGHC:37942 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 471 of 2020 Ku. Babita Pradhan D/o Shri Sukhdev Pradhan Aged About 31 Years Presently Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Pardhiya, Block Pithoura, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh., District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Secretary Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Panchayat, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Director Public Instructions, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. C Jayant K. Rao, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, GA ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 24/08/2026 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to make a representation before the respondent/competent authority with respect to absorption as he SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN Date: 2026.08.24 17:18:13 +0530 2 submits that petitioner has been absorbed in the year 2019 and 2020 whereas he is entitled for absorption w.e.f 01/07/2018. 2. The prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner seems fair and reasonable. 3. Accordingly, the aforesaid liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner and this writ petition stands disposed of. No cost(s). sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if