Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33151 (PNJ)

AMRITPAL KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CWP/22132/2026 · 2026-07-21

Kuldeep Tiwari

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-22132 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Amritpal Kaur State of Punjab and CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, prays for issuance of a Mandamus upon the respondents to station of Lecturer (Punjab 2. for the petitioner fairly submits that the petitioner did not participate in the earlier transfer drive which abstain Further, he the claim of the petitioner. entertain the instant writ petition, and the same is 21.07.2026 Ak Sharma 22132-2026 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of decision: Amritpal Kaur Versus State of Punjab and another CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Nitesh Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (Oral) The petitioner, by instituting the instant writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, prays for issuance of a Mandamus upon the respondents to adjust/post her against a vacant station of Lecturer (Punjabi). At the outset, upon being pointedly asked, for the petitioner fairly submits that the petitioner did not participate in the earlier transfer drive. However, he fail abstained the petitioner from participating he could not refer to any instructions the claim of the petitioner. In such a situation, this Court has no reason to entertain the instant writ petition, and the same is .2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-22132-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.07.2026 ….Petitioner ….Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI , Advocate, The petitioner, by instituting the instant writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, prays for issuance of a adjust/post her against a vacant eing pointedly asked, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the petitioner did not participate in fails to tender any cogent reason, participating in the transfer drive. could not refer to any instructions or rules, thereby justifying In such a situation, this Court has no reason to entertain the instant writ petition, and the same is dismissed. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE Yes Yes/No s The petitioner, by instituting the instant writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, prays for issuance of a adjust/post her against a vacant earned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the petitioner did not participate in , . , thereby justifying In such a situation, this Court has no reason to AMIT KUMAR 2026.07.24 12:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document