Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33131 (KAR)

SMT. PARVATHAMMA, v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/28038/2025 · 2026-08-18

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010606012025 NC: 2026:KHC:44192 WP No. 28038 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 28038 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SMT. PARVATHAMMA, W/O LATE CHANDRASHEKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT NO.114, 2ND STAGE, NEAR AMRUTHAMAYI SCHOOL, BOGADI MYSORE - 570 026 NOTE: SENIOR CITIZENSHIP BENEFITS NOT CLAIMED BY THE PETITIONER. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ROOPESHA B.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MYSURU, OFFICE AT GIRIBHOVIPALYA SIDDARTHANAGAR, MYSURU - 570 011 2. THE COMMISSIONER MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JHANSI RANI LAKSHMI BAI RD., CHAMARAJAPURA, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010606012025 NC: 2026:KHC:44192 WP No. 28038 of 2025 CHAMARAJAPURAM MOHALLA, LAKSHMIPURAM MYSURU - 570 005 3. THE TAHSILDAR MYSURU TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, NAZARBAD MYSURU - 570 010 4. THE DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS PROJECT OFFICE CITY SURVEY, NAZARBAD, MYSURU - 570 010 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SPOORTHY HEGDE N.,HCGP FOR R1, R3 AND R4; SRI. G B SHARATH GOWDA.,ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I) ISSUE ANY APPROPRIATE ORDER OR DIRECTION OR A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE 3RD RESPONDENT TAHSILDAR TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 22/07/2024 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE - D AND FURTHER DIRECT THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO TALLY COLUMN NO.3 AND 9 OF THE RTC AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010606012025 NC: 2026:KHC:44192 WP No. 28038 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the claim made by the petitioner is to direct respondent No.3 - Tahsildar to consider the representation dated 22.07.2024 (Annexure-D) submitted by the petitioner. 3. It is contended by the learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 that, the respondent No.2 is required to be heard by respondent No.3 before considering the application submitted by the petitioner at Annexure-D. 4. In that view of the matter, respondent No.3 is directed to issue notice to respondent No.2 before considering the representation dated 22.07.2024 (Annexure-D) submitted by the petitioner. Thereafter, respondent No.3 shall take an appropriate decision in the matter, in accordance with law. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010606012025 NC: 2026:KHC:44192 WP No. 28038 of 2025 With this observation, the Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE PHM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 63