CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION AND OTHER v. CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL AND ANOTHER
CWP/22297/2026 · 2026-07-22
Amarinder Singh Grewal, Harsimran Singh Sethi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33127 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33127 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-22297-2026 (O&M) -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 133 CWP-22297-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision :22.07.2026 Chandigarh Administration and others
...Petitioners
Versus Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh & another ...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL
Present: Ms. Madhu Dayal, Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Kumar Premi, Advocate for petitioner-Administration. Mr. Rohit Seth, Advocate for respondent No.2. * * * Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral)
1. Present writ petition has been filed for quashing/setting aside the impugned order dated 08.12.2025 (Annexure P/1) passed by respondent No.1-Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as ‘Tribunal’)
2. After arguing at considerable length, learned counsel for the petitioners-Administration on instructions submits that though, directions have been given to appoint the selected candidates on the basis of their merit but the only liberty be given to the petitioner-Administration that in case, at any given point of time after their appointment but before they clear their probation, any information is received which proves that the B.Ed. certificate possessed by the candidate concerned was not legally obtained, AARTI SHARMA 2026.07.24 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-22297-2026 (O&M) -2- action can be taken against him/her in accordance with law.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2 submits that he does not have any objection in case, the liberty as prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioners, be given.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner-Administration submits that keeping in view the above, present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty as prayed for.
5. Ordered accordingly.
6. Civil miscellaneous application pending, if any, is also disposed of.
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE July 22, 2026 aarti Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes Whether reportable : No AARTI SHARMA 2026.07.24 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document