Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3312 (UTT)

SATISH KUMAR v. MOHIT AGARWAL

SA/32/2026 · 2026-04-16

Siddhartha Sah

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS SA No.32 of 2026 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Mr. Avidit Noliyal, Advocate for the appellant. The Registry has pointed out the defect that as per Order 43 Rule 1 of CPC, the appeal from order should have been filed instead of second appeal. After going through the relevant provisions of CPC, Mr. Avidit Noliyal, learned counsel for the appellant prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present second appeal with liberty to file appeal from order. The present second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as above. [ (Siddhartha Sah, J.) 16.04.2026 Ravi