1 CGHC010101912021 2026:CGHC:34675 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2378 of 2021 1 - Smt. Asha Manikpuri, W/o Pramod Manikpuri Aged About 32 Years, House No. B/03 2 - Smt. Gomati Kashyap, W/o Sarwan Kashyap, Aged About 29 Years, House No. B/10 3 -Pratibha Pandey W/o Pashupati Pandey, Aged About 34 Years, House No. B/18 4 -Priyanka Pandey, W/o Rajkumar Pandey, Aged About 35 Years, House No. B/17 All R/o Shikshak Colony, Mangla District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 5 - Rupa Das, W/o Sushant Das, Aged About 51 Years, House No. A/08 6 - Vahida Begum W/o Firoz Begum Aged About 33 Years, House No. A/10 7 - Shama Begum W/o Amzad Khan, Aged About 30 Years, House No. A/11 No. 5 to 7 are R/o Keshar Awas, Rajkishore Nagar, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 8 - Laxmi Nag, W/o Santosh Nag, Aged About 41 Years House No. M/14 9 - Santibai W/o Banwari Lal, Aged About 70 Years House No. M/10 10 - Urmila Rajput, W/o Vijay Rajput, Aged About 36 Years, House No. J/20 No. 8 to 10 are R/o Harshringar Colony, Rajkishore Nagar, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners GOURI MUDALIAR Digitally signed by GOURI MUDALIAR Date: 2026.08.13 11:34:43 +0530 2 versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Urban Administration And Development Department, Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Vikas Bhawan, Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 3 -The Executive Engineer, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioners : Shri C.R. Sahu, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Bharat Lal Dembra, Advocate. For State/respondent No.1 : Ms. Shailja Shukla, G.A. For respondents No.2 & 3 : Shri Pranjal Shukla, Advocate. SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 06/08/2026 1. Petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the notice dated 26.03.2021 issued by the respondent no.3 and further direct the respondent no.2 & 3 not to disturb the possession of the petitioners and secure their right to enjoy over property under the scheme as stated above by permanently allotting houses to the petitioners as per possession over the houses. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no.2 & 3 not to take any action either to evict the petitioners from the houses or forcing them to left their house as they are living and allotted houses after following due process of law. 3 10.3 Any other relief, which may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be allowed.” 2. Learned counsel for respondents No.2 & 3 would submit that this writ petition is filed by the petitioners seeking relief that the petitioners may not be evicted from the house possessed by them. It is contention of learned counsel for respondents No.2 & 3 that the house which are possessed by the petitioners have been allotted to them and they have also filed the copy of the allotment letter in their favour along with the covering memo. He also submits that in the above facts of the case, as the houses have already been allotted to the petitioners, they will not be forcefully evicted from the house possessed by them and nothing remains for adjudication in this writ petition. 3. On due consideration of submission of learned counsel for respondents No.2 & 3, this writ petition is disposed of in view of the submission made by learned counsel for respondents No.2 & 3 that the houses possessed by the petitioners have been allotted to them. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge gouri