IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 119 Mukesh Kumar and others State of Haryana CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Constitution of India is for 18.06.2026 (Annexure P services of the petitioner engaged through (HKRNL) as Helper have been dispensed with on the alleged ground of non vacant posts actions arising therefrom. petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition, with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars. 23.07.2026 rishu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Mukesh Kumar and others Versus State of Haryana and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. RK Girdhwal, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Yadav, Advocate for the NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for quashing the impugned 18.06.2026 (Annexure P-16 Colly.) passed by respondent No. 4 services of the petitioner engaged through (HKRNL) as Helper have been dispensed with on the alleged ground of non vacant posts along with consequential relieving order and all subsequent actions arising therefrom. After arguing for some time, petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition, with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty afores Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. .07.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-22462-2026 Date of Decision: 23.07.2026 .… Petitioners .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA RK Girdhwal, Advocate for Advocate for the petitioners. Prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the quashing the impugned Speaking Order dated 16 Colly.) passed by respondent No. 4 whereby services of the petitioner engaged through (HKRNL) as Helper have been dispensed with on the alleged ground of non-availability of sanctioned along with consequential relieving order and all subsequent r arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition, with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the rder dated whereby services of the petitioner engaged through (HKRNL) as Helper have been availability of sanctioned along with consequential relieving order and all subsequent learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant RISHU KATARIA 2026.07.24 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.