2026:HHC:11625 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.5065 of 2026 Decided on: 16.04.2026 Surinder Kumar & others … Petitioners Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioners: Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. R.P. Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of respondents. 2. Though, this Court is of the considered view that the present writ petition is not maintainable as what the petitioner is in fact seeking is the execution of the earlier judgment passed by this Court in favour of the petitioner, may be indirectly, on the request of learned Counsel for the petitioner, without any adjudication on merit, same is disposed of with the observation that the representation filed by the petitioner be decided by the Authority concerned within a period of 12 weeks from today. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge April 16, 2026 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?