IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 119 CWP-22479-2026 Date of Decision: 23.07.2026 MUKESH DEVI ... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: Mr. Pankaj Nanhera, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sachin Jangra, Mr. Anurag Mor and Ms. Ishita Arora, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned Sr. Counsel submits that the petitioner had been recommended by the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) for promotion to the post of Inspector, however, no formal order has been passed till date by respondent No.3, while in case of the similarly circumstanced employees, who were recommended alongwith him in the said meeting of DPC, the same have been issued. Reference in this regard is made to one such order dated 06.07.2026, Annexure P-6. A representation dated 15.07.2026, Annexure P-18 has been submitted by him, however, it has not yet evoked any response, thus, prays for the same to be decided in a time bound manner. RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.23 20:10 I am the author of this document CWP-22479-2026 -2- 2. Learned State Counsel on instructions states that in case there is no impediment, the needful shall be done within a period of four weeks, which satisfies the learned Senior Counsel. 3. Disposed of accordingly. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JULY 23, 2026. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.23 20:10 I am the author of this document