Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33084 (PNJ)

LALIT MOHAN v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/22558/2026 · 2026-07-23

Subhas Mehla, Vikas Bahl

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-22558-2026 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-22558-2026 Decided on: 23.07.2026 LALIT MOHAN …...Petitioner V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ……Respondents CORAM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J (ORAL) 1. This civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent no.2 to decide the Execution Application No.RERA-GRG-3409-2025 dated 08.07.2025 (Annexure P-2) pending before it within a time bound manner as directed by this Hon’ble Court in CWP-7936-2026, titled as ‘Mamta Gulati versus State of Haryana’ decided vide order dated 17.03.2026 (Annexure P-3). 2. A perusal of the file would show that only one zimni order dated 01.10.2025, passed by Assistant Registrar, HARERA, Gurugram has been placed on record and no other zimni order has been placed on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition be disposed of but liberty be granted to the petitioner to revive the same after placing on record the relevant zimni orders. MAMTA 2026.07.24 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-22558-2026 [2] 4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 23.07.2026 mamta Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MAMTA 2026.07.24 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document