1 CGHC010420282024 2026:CGHC:36417 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6011 of 2024 1 - Laxman Mandavi S/o Shri Mukaram Aged About 25 Years R/o Boys Hostel-1 Late Baliram Kashyap Memorial Medical Colleger, Dimrapal , Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh 2 - Silash D Marak S/o Shri Paul Sangkli Aged About 26 Years R/o Intern Hostel Late Baliram Kashyap Memorial Medical College Dimrapal, Jagdalpur District Bastar, Chhattisgarh 3 - Devendra Kumar Kashyap S/o Shri Bojinath Kashyap Aged About 24 Years R/o Boys Hostel-I Late Baliram Kashyap Memorial Medical Colleger Dimrapal, Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh 4 - Hemlata Sewai S/o Shri Rajendra Sawai Aged About 23 Years R/o Girls Hostel-I, Late Baliram Kashyap Memorial Medical College, Dimrapal, Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Werlfare, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Of Medical Education North Block Sector 19, Swasthya Bhawan, 2nd Floorf, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (C,g.) ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA 2 3 - Late Baliram Kashyap , Memorial Medical College Through The Dean Dimrapal, Jagdalpur District Bastar, Chhattisgarh 4 - National Medical Commissioner(Nmc) Through Its Chairman, Sector- 8, Dwarika Phase-1, New Delhi 5 - Pt. Deendayal Upadhyay Smriti Health Science And Ayush University Through The Registrar Uparwara, Sector-40, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Pragya Vaishnav, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Prateek Sharma, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 14.08.2026 1. During the course of hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause of action no longer survives, and in view of subsequent developments, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the same and has no objection to the petition being dismissed as infructuous. 3. In view of the above, and since nothing further survives for adjudication, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Saxena