D/L577 20.08.2026 Bpg. C.R.M. (A) 2641 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Chanchal Police Station Case No.43 of 2026 dated 15.01.2026 under Sections 85/115(2)/118(1)/64/303(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023; XYZ & Anr. Versus The State of West Bengal & Anr. Mr. Amit Ranjan Pati Mr. Ashok Halder Ms. Reshmi Mukherjee Ms. Swastika Chowdhury Ms. Ilika Nag Mr. Avijit Chatterjee. …for the petitioners. Mr. Kaushik Dey Mr. Harshit Jaiswal. …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been foisted with the present criminal case because of matrimonial discord and dispute. Learned advocate for the State has handed over the case diary. Statement of the victim relates to serious accusations against both the petitioners. Having considered the same, I am not inclined to grant 2 the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, CRM(A)2641 of 2026 is rejected. Memo of Evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)