Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33065 (KAR)

SMT NAEEMUNNISA v. THE ADDL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/21075/2026 · 2026-07-31

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010463932026 NC: 2026:KHC:40352 WP No. 21075 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.21075 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. NAEEMUNNISA W/O NAYAZ PASHA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT SHARIFF MOHALLA DODDAPETE ROAD, KUNIGAL-572130 TUMAKURU DISTRICT. 2. SRI. TABREZ, S/O LATE TAJUNNISA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESIDING AT WARD NO.16, HALE MASJID MOHALLA, MAGADI TOWN-562120 RAMANAGARA DISTRICT. 3. SMT.SHAMSHUNNISA W/O LATE CHAND PASHA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.890/1, TANJAVOOR MOHALLA, MADDURU ROAD, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010463932026 NC: 2026:KHC:40352 WP No. 21075 of 2026 KUNIGAL-572130, TUMAKURU DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. GOVINDARAJA T.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE ADDL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, DEVANAHALLI-562110. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA-561203, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHASILDAR NELAMANGALA TALUK, NELAMANGALA-562123, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 4. SMT.GANGALAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE RANGASWAMAIAH P. AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. 5. SRI. GANGARANGAIAH, S/O LATE PUTTRARANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT DODDASARANGI PALYA, KAMBATHANAHALLI POST-572118, GULURU HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010463932026 NC: 2026:KHC:40352 WP No. 21075 of 2026 6. SRI RANGASWAMY R. S/O LATE RANGASWAMAIAH P. AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,. RESPONDENTS NO.4 AND 6 ARE R/AT BEHIND POLICE STATION, S.C.COLONY, DABASPETE-562111, SOMPURA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. NOW R/O WALLS MAIN, K.R. WATER WORK, NEW MANDALI, N.T.ROAD, SHIVAMOGGA-577201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF THE ADDL. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, AT DEVANAHALLI IN R.P.34/2025 DATED 15-05-2026 IN ANNEXURE-W; QUASH THE ORDER OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA, IN R.A.(N) 415/2023 DATED 25-03-2025 IN ANNEXURE-V; AND ETC. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010463932026 NC: 2026:KHC:40352 WP No. 21075 of 2026 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. In this Writ Petition, petitioners are assailing the order dated 15.05.2026 in R.P.No.34/2025 (Annexure-W) passed by respondent No.1 and the order dated 25.03.2025 in R.A.(N)415/2023 (Annexure-V) passed by respondent No.2, inter alia, sought for quashing the mutation made in favour of the private respondents herein. 2. Having heard the arguments of Sri. Govindaraja T., learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Smt. B.P. Radha, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3, perusal of the writ papers would indicate that, khata in favour of private respondent in M.R.No.1/83-84 was made based on the order dated 30.01.1982 passed by the Land Tribunal, Nelamangala. - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010463932026 NC: 2026:KHC:40352 WP No. 21075 of 2026 3. It is also forthcoming from the records that 2 acres of land has already been converted for non-agricultural purpose on 06.09.2012. In that view of the matter, both the authorities were justified in rejecting the application made by the petitioners. Accordingly, I do not find any merit in this Writ Petition. 4. The Writ Petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25